Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: msnimje
This case has nothing to do with the inflammatory title "Homosexual Agenda" The case was about protecting people against discrimination because of their sexual orientation.

You are so clueless it ain't even funny. (Or maybe you're a proponent of the gay agenda, who knows.) Making sexual orientation a status for protection is a key element in the gay agenda. If some homo wants to only rent to homos, that's his business. Old Mrs. Thompson shouldn't be forced to take on a homo couple or unmarried couple if she doesn't want to.

53 posted on 08/04/2005 10:03:32 AM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I believe abortion should be safe and legal in this country." -- Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ

Exactly.

I would add that if a private owner who happened to be homosexual did not want to rent to normal folks (us heteros), he should be able to do so anyway. It's still his property.


57 posted on 08/04/2005 10:06:38 AM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson