The case before the Supreme Court, Romer vs. Evans, dealt with a voter-approved 1992 Colorado initiative that would have allowed employers and landlords to exclude gays from jobs and housing.
Neither gays nor anyone else has a "right" to work for / live with a property owner who doesn't want them there. If Roberts fought this law, screw him.
Sloth, even that description of the Romer case is slanted. What the Colorado voters said was that you can't make homosexuality a protected category with special rights.
This is really upsetting news. Roberts is a guy who has been positioning himself for power all of his life. Is the late-acquired wife just part of that positioning?
So what you're saying is that a private employer or owner can discriminate against sexual choice but not against religion, race, creed or gender?
Isn't that kind of contradictory?