[MikefromOhio]

i choose not to be snakebitten.

besides that fact, gay rights aren't my only qualifier.

This judge is ardently pro-life for example...

[Rutles4Ever]

This judge is ardently pro-life for example...

Maybe he'll take some pro-bono work for NARAL, too, since he can separate his beliefs from his career.

[jwalsh07]

I didn't say it was an only qualifier, just something to be considered. I happen to think the constitution protects the unborn, a radical view not even Scalia agrees with admittedly. But that's another story.

I'm pretty sure Roberts is a vote to overturn major parts of Roe and Doe v Bolton but I'm not sure because there is no record. So asking questions and being dubious is OK by me.

In fact, I see nothing wrong with either side asking potential justices about their personal morality and if and how it would affect their interpretation of constitutional law. I'm especially interested in the radical secualar humanist derivation of morality as it pertains to law and the constitution.