Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

no....

and I would bet that he wouldn't if he were a justice, however he was a lawyer at the time, not a justice.


64 posted on 08/04/2005 8:03:04 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (When Judge Roberts is confirmed, FR will be EXTREMELY funny that day...Get your PROZAC here!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: MikeinIraq
So, if he did the pro bono work because he believed that Romer was a critical case that must be decided in favor of speacial rights for a class of folks, that should give one pause for thought, no?

I'm not an alarmist but I wasn't born yesterday either. Souter, Stephens and Kennedy were given to us by good Republican Presidents which means appointing Justices to the SCOTUS is a very tricky business.

Being concerned because Dubya appointed somebody with no appellate record to speak of is not abnormal, it logically follow the past 30 years of appointment history.

75 posted on 08/04/2005 8:08:08 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson