He may be qualified to sit on SCOTUS but so were Ginsberg and Souter.
I'm still undecided on this guy, perhaps you could tell me what he's done that makes you his advocate here.
He has the full backing of the President....that is good enough for me.
Have you read the dozen or so other articles from his Reagan era work where he opposed bussing, Affirm. Action, Roe v Wade, or his later work where he opposed and ruled against the EPA, or where he took a restrictive view of the Commerce Clause, or his recent rulings where he upheld military tribunals for terrorists?