Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJY1288

I am suspicious but not enough to reject roberts.

When it comes to this type of work, you do not HAVE to do something that objects your conscience. If he worked for a megafirm with hundreds of lawyers this does not mean much but do not underestimate the value of collaberation.

If this is an indication of how he would rule on homosexual marriage, then it is a dealbreaker. As a lawyer he should already KNOW that homosexuals already have access to cohabitation and estate planning. (even just making a deed "tenancy by the entireties" produces right now what homosexuals claim they don't have)


18 posted on 08/03/2005 10:01:18 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
I've done a fair share of reading about Roberts past and I have not found anything that would make me worry about him other than his short time on the bench. Roberts is not a small time Judge, nor a small time Litigator. The more I hear about his past, the more I like him
32 posted on 08/03/2005 10:19:06 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson