Posted on 08/03/2005 9:41:19 PM PDT by STARWISE
"In his new role, Foley will assume responsibility as well for the existing Nonproliferation Center, which dealt with a broad range of proliferation issues, and the Office of Transnational Issues' Weapons Intelligence Staff, which is composed largely of scientists and engineers. He will report to Tenet."
This is making those of us, who started screaming, "Check Foley out two + years ago, more on target, than we thought.
"I'll bet its Alan Foley....Val's boss."
Foley was probably up to his liberal butt in this, or one of his liberal underlings was the responsible one/ones.
Would "Near-Eastern" include Pakistan and the A.Q. Khan network of nuclear proliferators. My guess is yes.
The CIA so dropped the ball on this one, that they should all have been fired.
"Would "Near-Eastern" include Pakistan and the A.Q. Khan network of nuclear proliferators. My guess is yes."
Probably.
They dropped the nuclear ball on both Pakistan and India, didn't they?
The following was posted on National Review's blog "The Corner" this morning by Cliff May:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NEW CLUES IN THE MYSTERY OF VALERIE PLAME [Cliff May] A recent article in the London Telegraph reports that Valerie Plame has been on an enforced leave of absence -- that she has been on unpaid leave for a year.
Now at first you might think, OK, sure, after Bob Novak wrote that she was a CIA operative and the Nations David Corn wrote that she had been a top-secret agent -- providing details about her work and even her cover story -- the CIA would give her a vacation.
But Novak and Corn wrote about Plame in July 2003.
If the Telegraph is correct, she was not put on unpaid leave of absence until a full year later, around July 2004. Why?
One also might think she voluntarily decided to take some time off but then it wouldnt be an enforced leave of absence, would it?
There also is this intriguing tidbit: According to The New York Times, a former CIA officer, whose name remains secret, is filing a lawsuit against the agency because he was dismissed in 2004 the same year that Plame was put on enforced leave of absence.
Whats more, the fired CIA officer worked in the same unit of the agency as Plame. And his lawyer likened his client's situation to that of Valerie Wilson, also known as Valerie Plame.
Thanks for posting this very interesting find and pinging me. So Plame has been on an enforced leave of absence -- that she has been on unpaid leave for a year.
"Add this to the mix.
The following was posted on National Review's blog "The Corner" this morning by Cliff May:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NEW CLUES IN THE MYSTERY OF VALERIE PLAME [Cliff May] A recent article in the London Telegraph reports that Valerie Plame has been on an enforced leave of absence -- that she has been on unpaid leave for a year.
Now at first you might think, OK, sure, after Bob Novak wrote that she was a CIA operative and the Nations David Corn wrote that she had been a top-secret agent -- providing details about her work and even her cover story -- the CIA would give her a vacation.
But Novak and Corn wrote about Plame in July 2003.
If the Telegraph is correct, she was not put on unpaid leave of absence until a full year later, around July 2004. Why?
One also might think she voluntarily decided to take some time off but then it wouldnt be an enforced leave of absence, would it?
There also is this intriguing tidbit: According to The New York Times, a former CIA officer, whose name remains secret, is filing a lawsuit against the agency because he was dismissed in 2004 the same year that Plame was put on enforced leave of absence.
Whats more, the fired CIA officer worked in the same unit of the agency as Plame. And his lawyer likened his client's situation to that of Valerie Wilson, also known as Valerie Plame.
Gramps there is a thread going on here at FR regarding the information. Not many posts so far, but you might want to check it out for views of posters.
Gramps it is sure telling us something that we had to get this information from another country.
"Gramps there is a thread going on here at FR regarding the information. Not many posts so far, but you might want to check it out for views of posters."
Please post the link
Did anyone see this a while back:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent7777/2005/07/17/
The CIA fired somebody?? The sky has to be falling.
No, the FBI investigates people. If someone is suspected of divulging classified information to a foreign government the FBI investigates. But, they would have no part in this investigation.
I don't know why Reuters feels the need to be so indirect about where the copy came from. Obviously it came from Roy Krieger, the attorney for the fired agent. Krieger wanted publicity in the hopes anti-Bush forces would help ratchet up pressure. He and his client have a lawsuit going, and they want M O N E Y.
I was asking because that's what this "Doe" is requesting.
"In both cases, officials brought unwelcome information on WMD in the period prior to the Iraq invasion, and retribution followed," Krieger was quoted in the report as saying.
The former officer has been accused of having sex with a female contact and diverting to his own use money earmarked for payments to informants. He denies both charges, according to The Times.
******
Washington D.C. attorney Roy Krieger has filed a class action lawsuit alleging that CIA treated employees who hired attorneys more harshly than those without attorneys.
snip
A lawyer representing one of the CIA officers, Roy Krieger, put his finger on the logical difficulty when he said it was manifestly unjust to blame individuals when the failure was systemic. It's shameful that the CIA caved in to political pressure to provide scapegoats. The agency has already publicly admitted that the map provided to the officers contained errors, absent which the Chinese Embassy would not have been mistakenly targetted. These officers were asked to improvise and did their best with the tools provided to them.
* Roy Krieger, DC-based lawyer representing the undercover CIA operative filing the lawsuit. He specializes in national security cases and has represented scores of people in the CIA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.