To: Bigun
I agree the current tax is a nightmare. I'm just jumping through all those hoops to try to find a real value for the embedded tax which would go away with implementing the FairTax. I came up with about 9% direct + compliance costs. I have a hard time believing that is large enough so its removal result in the same net prices after the Fair Tax is added.
228 posted on
08/04/2005 7:57:39 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
To: KarlInOhio
I have a hard time believing that is large enough so its removal result in the same net prices after the Fair Tax is added.In some cases - those in which only few hands have been involved in the production - it won't. In others where many hands are involved it will be much more.
When fairtaxers talk about that they are, at least all the ones I know, talking about an AVERAGE.
233 posted on
08/04/2005 8:35:11 AM PDT by
Bigun
(IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
To: KarlInOhio
I agree the current tax is a nightmare. I'm just jumping through all those hoops to try to find a real value for the embedded tax which would go away with implementing the FairTax. I came up with about 9% direct + compliance costs. I have a hard time believing that is large enough so its removal result in the same net prices after the Fair Tax is added.
Look at my post #61. The only way you can get anywhere near the suggested price drop is if you include the employee's payroll and income taxes. That means the employee's would have to take a cut in their current pre-tax wages for the prices to go down this much. (And that isn't going to happen.)
283 posted on
08/04/2005 10:42:56 AM PDT by
Your Nightmare
(The FairTax. The first tax plan with Fanboys.)
To: KarlInOhio
Karl, I hate to tell you this, but I don't think you are an economist.
392 posted on
08/04/2005 1:44:09 PM PDT by
rwrcpa1
(April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson