Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GummyIII

You are repeating a lie.


56 posted on 08/03/2005 10:39:46 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Do the research, look at the statistics. You'll see that as killers, those two breeds are much more prevalent. The numbers speak.

In other words, back up you words with facts.


69 posted on 08/03/2005 10:42:25 AM PDT by GummyIII (If you have the ability, it's your responsibility." Marine Sgt. John Place, Silver Star recipient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com; Syds Dad; All
"Studies indicate that pit bull-type dogs were involved in approximately a third of human DBRF (i.e., dog bite related fatalities) reported during the 12-year period from 1981 through1992, and Rottweilers were responsible for about half of human DBRF reported during the 4 years from 1993 through 1996....[T]he data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and 1998.... thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities." (Sacks JJ, Sinclair L, Gilchrist J, Golab GC, Lockwood R. Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998. JAVMA 2000;217:836-840.)
90 posted on 08/03/2005 10:48:15 AM PDT by GummyIII (If you have the ability, it's your responsibility." Marine Sgt. John Place, Silver Star recipient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson