I know that was your point--it was the other guy's point that your argument is meaningless. Searching on "grave" and "subway" returns 400,000 hits. Searching on "rebel" and "cookie" returns 315,000 hits. The number of hits is perfectly meaningless.
As for "detailing the dangers", can you give one, not two but one, example of someone who started a low-carb diet with healthy kidneys and suffered any sort of kidney damage as a result? I didn't think so--because there hasn't been one. Doctors have stated why they think low-carb dieting is a horrible idea, but they have not produced clinical studies indicating any risks. If you want to make your case, you'll have to do more than count the hits.