Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinanju
The flat tax is still an income tax. Our country did very well on sales taxes until the early part of the 20th century when congress passed the 16th amendment and BSed people into thinking it would only affect the rich. See what happened to it. It was a flat tax at the time.

As long as we leave the income tax in place we leave ourselves open to the same thing we have now. We don't need an income tax of any kind. Sales taxes work better than income taxes and we don't make criminals of our citizens with it the way we do with an income tax.

I have been praying for the people of this country to come to their senses in regards to an income tax since I was a young man( a ways back) and now we are finally getting somewhere but too many people can't seem to give up the apron strings of an income tax.

As far as the people who say that the real amount of the tax is 30 percent, so what? We pay that and more now with the income tax. We will pay what we pay now except for one big difference: You don't have to buy goods if you don't want.

14 posted on 08/02/2005 1:08:46 PM PDT by calex59 (If you have to take me apart to get me there, then I don't want to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: calex59
"Our country did very well on sales taxes until the early part of the 20th century when congress passed the 16th amendment and BSed people into thinking it would only affect the rich. See what happened to it."

From Brushaber v. Union Pacific Decided January 24, 1916.
We are of opinion, however, [240 U.S. 1, 11] that the confusion is not inherent, but rather arises from the conclusion [assumption] that the 16th Amendment provides for a hitherto unknown power of taxation; that is, a power to levy an income tax which, although direct, should not be subject to the regulation of apportionment applicable to all other direct taxes. And the far-reaching effect of this erroneous assumption will be made clear by generalizing the many contentions advanced in argument to support it [the erroneous assumption],

142 posted on 08/04/2005 6:29:26 AM PDT by patriot_wes (papal infallibility - a proud tradition since 1869)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson