Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MplsSteve; Chena; CSM; exnavychick; monday; MEGoody; coloradan; houeto; All

You and your heroes in the legislature have no concept of property rights. If you did, you'd be just as outraged about this as anyone, whether you smoke or not.

Not one person was forced to breathe secondhand smoke. Not a single one. Bar and restaurant workers didn't have to seek employment in an establishment that allowed smoking. Customers did not have to patronize businesses that allowed smoking. Why is this such a difficult concept for you to grasp? Why do you have to run whining and crying to the nanny state every time you see something you don't like?

I just don't get it. I really don't.


257 posted on 08/02/2005 3:37:15 PM PDT by sheltonmac ("Duty is ours; consequences are God's." -Gen. Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: sheltonmac; MplsSteve

We'll never be able to understand what sort of demons lurk in the minds of some folks, sheltonmac. It looks like MplsSteve has left the building. Perhaps smoked out by the honest, thoughtful and truthful commentary posted by our fellow FReepers on this thread.

I believe it is possible that MplsSteve believes in private property rights, but when it comes to smoking bans, he's more than willing to make an exception. He fails to understand that trampling on one person's freedom opens the door to other stampedes. The next time, he may be the one trampled on.

Perhaps that is why he refused to answer my simple question about basic private property rights. That fact tells much about him. He believes in his freedoms, just not everyone else's.


259 posted on 08/02/2005 3:48:31 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
Not one person was forced to breathe secondhand smoke. Not a single one.

But, but, but....they are supposed t be able to go where ever they want without being offended.....

Bar and restaurant workers didn't have to seek employment in an establishment that allowed smoking.

You are introducing fact here, only emothion is permitted.

Customers did not have to patronize businesses that allowed smoking.

see above

Why is this such a difficult concept for you to grasp?

Selfishness.

Why do you have to run whining and crying to the nanny state every time you see something you don't like?

Because it is easier.....they do not have to take responsibility for themselves.

264 posted on 08/02/2005 4:07:43 PM PDT by Gabz (Smoking ban supporters are in favor of the Kelo ruling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac

"Why do you have to run whining and crying to the nanny state every time you see something you don't like?"

Because he is a communist. Whining and crying is what they do.


287 posted on 08/02/2005 9:42:55 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson