"There's nothing in the world you can say that will justify your so-called "right" to inflict harm on others."
What harm is inflicted on others? In reality, I can prove that peanuts can cause greater harm than SHS, should we ban peanuts from bars? How about banning shellfish from seafood restaurants? Candles? BBQ grills?
Persons that don't want to subject themselves to several types of "dangers", are able to chose not to enter property with those dangers. Of course, you are to weak to do so without the use of government guns to eliminate SHS from all venues, just in case you might want to enter that property.
Oooooohh, boy.
Here we go again. The same old "slippery slope" theory that eventually causes people like you to bring up things like peanuts and shellfish to justify their right to inflict bodily harm on others.
Sorry, that's not gonna fly here. There's no reasonable comparison to be made here.