Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: green iguana
Maybe a parasail like they envisioned for Gemini?

That was an interesting idea but it took too long to develop and by the time the bugs were worked out the Gemini program had ended. Also, a capsule with a parasail lacks the cross-range capability of a true lifting body design, which means control of the spacecraft after re-entry is a bit limited. I'd rather have a true lifting body vehicle, which means after re-entry the flight crew can land plus or minus 500 miles from the intended touchdown point; for example, a lifting body intended to land at Edwards AFB could land as far south as Miramar Marine Corps Air Base and as far north as Beale AFB.

59 posted on 08/02/2005 10:14:50 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: RayChuang88

> a capsule with a parasail lacks the cross-range capability of a true lifting body design

Actually, the Apollo capsule *did* have an impressive cross-range. Remember, it did not drop straight in, blunt end directly forward; it was asymmetrically balanced, so it "leaned" over to one side. That turned it into a half-ass decent lifting body with several hundred miles cross range. Hypersonic L/D was surprisingly good.


104 posted on 08/02/2005 11:09:29 AM PDT by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson