Story picked up by a liberal hack....
http://tampatrib.com/News/columns/MGBC7DHTZBE.html
If Ruth thought Crist did the right thing, you can bet it was the wrong thing. He is like a endorsement from the NEA; if the NEA endorsed a candidate, whats wrong with him?
One other thing, if the law is an ass, then the law must be ignored or struck down. That is not judicial activism. Judges should rule laws are invalid or unconstitutional, and the law permitting the starving of a healthy but disabled woman should be struck down. I can't support the circus that occurred around Terri, but the principle was sound.
Judicial activism is creating "rights" out of thin air, like to right to kill your unborn child, and the upcoming right, to use the murdered child's stem cells to experiment with.
The St. Pete Times today said that Terri had a constitutional right to die. The truth be told that nobody has a constitutional right to be murdered by the government. Terri was martyred and Crist meant what he said at the Coral Gables banquet. He's just so ignorant that he thought he could speak freely among lawyers and crooked judges.
I've heard recently that there are a lot of attorneys who were against Terri's barbaric death and they are also against the spineless people in govt. who didn't save her.
Rush may be agreeing with Crist because Crist is somehow involved in Rush's warrant regarding his doc shopping charges. Rush may be defending Crist to help his own situation re: oxycontin.