Posted on 08/01/2005 6:47:06 PM PDT by woodb01
Why John Bolton Terrifies the Liberal Democrats Liberal Democrat Saying "liberal democrat" is an oxymoron--, there is no such thing. It is kind of like saying "jumbo shrimp," it sounds tasty, but if you stop and think about it, it is just silly. It is just as silly to say "liberal democrat," if you are left of the left you are simply a hardcore socialist. Socialist At its most basic, socialism is another name for the belief that government is god. In socialism (and its dear brothers National Socialism, communism, and fascism) government is the source of all power and of all sustenance and life. If the socialist god of government says you die, then, you die. Remember Terri Shiavo? Or what about partial birth abortion? Just like with Hitler and the gas chambers, Stalin-Lenin and the gulags, China and the "re-education camps," and the list goes on. I digress but you get the picture, whether you are a "choice" supporter or not, under socialism it is government that defines whether or not life is important. Bolton as Ambassador to the U.N. The United Nations is the world's pre-eminent socialist organization. It exists solely, exclusively, completely and totally for the centralization of global government power and for no other reason. Its entire purpose is to create a collectivist government body to control the world's governments. And how dare the United States defy their mandate to submit its sovereignty to the jurisdiction of the "International Criminal Court." Why is John Bolton so scary to the "Liberal Democrats?" Mr. Bolton's mistake, horror of horrors, is that he is gone on record as believing the United Nations needs real investigations into its corruption. The "liberal democrat" god is being challenged! By all the socialist gods, they are not going to sit still for that! Mr. Bolton made the fatal mistake of believing the corruption in a government body should be investigated and cleaned up. What a novel concept that is frightening to this little god's worshippers. How very sad that the "liberal democrats" attack Mr. Bolton for doing what any conscientious, red-blooded, patriotic American should do. I for one am thrilled that the socialists, er, I mean, the "liberal democrats" just lost another fight. For more background information, please see:
Week of August 1, 2005
NoDNC.com staff
Let's clear up definitions first, just so that we're all on the same page and with these definitions in mind, we'll deal with the terrible horrors of John Bolton, and why he seems to positively evil to the liberal democrats.
Conservative freedom loving eye for the liberal corrupt guy?
New word for the day--syndicalism.
1 : a revolutionary doctrine by which workers seize control of the economy and the government by direct means (as a general strike)
2 : a system of economic organization in which industries are owned and managed by the workers
3 : a theory of government based on functional rather than territorial representation
The other reason why Bolton might terrify democrats is that a full investigation into the UN might link Saddam payoffs to the democrat party via oil for food money.
This is the only explanation I have for the democrats obstruction of Bolton to what is really a fairly innocuous office.
Thanks for putting socialism and the UN in perspective. To the devout, the UN is idolatry, the socialist god. True Christians are diametrically opposed to it.
Personally, I don't think that Bolton can fix the UN.
Neither do I. No matter, as I would rather see it disbanded than fixed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.