Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs Mark

Where does the article say that the irrigation district was subsidized by the government? It says the farmers owned the water rights and they sold them because basically they were forced to do it. The federal government BLM is all about putting the "rights" of animals before the rights of citizens of this country and wanted to buy it " for the salmon......"

Why do you want the federal government to take over water resources in Idaho?

Are you a globalist who hates to see private Americans owning water rights?


8 posted on 08/01/2005 5:39:31 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: hedgetrimmer

If there is a Farmer ... there is a subsidy.


13 posted on 08/02/2005 3:33:49 AM PDT by Mark was here (My tag line was about to be censored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: hedgetrimmer
do you want the federal government to take over water resources in Idaho?

FedGov has retained ownership of navigable water in Alaska. That includes authority over water that feeds navigable water and runoff that drains into creeks that feed navigable water. Which is to say, authority over design of parking lots that abut creeks and drainages.

23 posted on 08/02/2005 9:39:38 AM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson