[Tribune7]

And where does he mention the teaching of evolution as justification for religious people to feel threatened?

He doesn't. He just mentions that religious people had a justification to feel threatened.

[Dimensio]

He doesn't. He just mentions that religious people had a justification to feel threatened.

But you said " He hits the nail on the head, however, about how evolution is seen as part of a general, and undeniable, assault on religion.".

So why are you now denying that evolution was part of it when you originally said that it was?

[narby]

In post #27 you said: He hits the nail on the head, however, about how evolution is seen as part of a general, and undeniable, assault on religion.

I said: "And where does he mention the teaching of evolution as justification for religious people to feel threatened?"

You replied: He doesn't. He just mentions that religious people had a justification to feel threatened.

Now which article did you read? The one where Krauthammer hit the nail on the head about how evolution is seen as part of a general assault on religion. Or the article where he didn't?

I think this is a general problem with creationists. They have very little reading comprehension and memory. They learn cartoon versions of evolution and cannot comprehend the theory any further. Or even comprehend the scientific meaning of "theory".

I can understand why the preachers are pushing this stuff now. It filters out anyone in the congregation with thinking skills. And when the preacher says "give me money", the folks in the congregation say "how much"?

It's just good business to preach literal Genesis these days.