Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b_sharp

The idea if "moral science" ended in the nineteenth century with Social Darwinism and later in the twentieth century with Ontal Logics.

Not since Kant has philosophy seriously entertained the notion of moral absolutes.

In terms of epistemonogy science has never entertained the notion of absolutes; moral or physical.

Not since Aristole has science been confused with theology. Accept by the Catholic Church during the time of Ptolomemy.


1,048 posted on 08/02/2005 7:25:54 PM PDT by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1031 | View Replies ]


To: beaver fever
Not since Aristole has science been confused with theology.

Wrong. We have four or five creos on every thread that confuse science and theology.

1,052 posted on 08/02/2005 7:28:49 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies ]

To: beaver fever

"Oh why should Nature's law be mutual butchery!"
--Jude the Obscure


1,053 posted on 08/02/2005 7:29:55 PM PDT by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies ]

To: beaver fever

Thanks. Excellent information.


1,096 posted on 08/02/2005 8:45:45 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson