Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: One Proud Dad
I guess the left coast does it different.

Wasn't always that way; up until about eight years ago, CHP couldn't use radar for speed enforcement, as the California courts felt it was too unreliable. That was before the Democrats' domination of the Assembly and the regime of "Red" Davis.

This thing costs $6,000 a month? That's $72,000 a year, why not just hire more cops?

26 posted on 08/01/2005 10:59:58 AM PDT by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: HolgerDansk

cops cost more than that!


29 posted on 08/01/2005 11:09:19 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: HolgerDansk
This thing costs $6,000 a month? That's $72,000 a year, why not just hire more cops?

Because not only does the camera operate 24 hours a day, without vacation or potty breaks, but the $6,000 a month covers all of the camera systems, not just one. How many cops will $72,000 a year hire? Keep in mind that the cost of a cop is not just salary, but also benefits, insurance, equipment, and so forth.

34 posted on 08/01/2005 11:20:42 AM PDT by Politicalities (http://www.politicalities.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: HolgerDansk

"This thing costs $6,000 a month? That's $72,000 a year, why not just hire more cops?"


the city banked about $450,000 in the first four months of operation. Over the next year, the tally should hit $800,000, according to the city's budget.

That should answer your question!


66 posted on 08/01/2005 1:57:15 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson