Then change the law. As long as the law says what it says, it should be enforced, and as long as it's enforced, it should be enforced as cheaply and effectively as possible.
Whatever happened to putting a cop on a motorcycle at an intersection with red-light running problems?
Last I heard, the law regarding compliance with traffic signals said nothing about enforcement only at "problem intersections". And a camera is a heck of a lot cheaper than a motorcycle cop, and a lot less likely to let family, friends, and cute women off with a warning.
http://www.redflex.com.au/traffic/pdfs/RedflexSpeed2V2.pdf
Check out this van they have to park in school zones....haha...this would make a fortune in my neighborhood....and a lot less kids would get creamed
Those same people will get their ticket taken care of by the corrupt cops.
"change the law"
Except that in cases where the revenue generated is significant, it doesn't matter if you have the whole town voting against it. The town government won't let go of a revenue source.
"...a camera is a heck of a lot cheaper than a motorcycle cop, and a lot less likely to let family, friends, and cute women off with a warning"
And a lot less likely to be able to make spot judgements on whether the violation was unavoidable, and much more likely to be "engineered" by the town to increase income through shortening the yellow light, or ticketing even marginal violations.
Traffic enforcement is one of the easiest ways to bring in added revenue when it is wanted, and towns will jigger the system to keep it flowing as long as they can.
No, that happens when the police reviewer gets the images and can then use them to blackmail people to get what he wants rather than have their driving record get a black mark.