IF
1) LAST TIME I CHECKED (a year or two ago), NO ONE KNOWS THE INCIDENCE.
THEY ASSUME IT'S RARE.
2) BUT EVEN IF they PROVED it rare in the GENERAL population of humans--
That would not be good enough.
They would need to prove that being a human chimera does not make one more prone to CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR (a reasonble suspicion, given how a chimera's DNA is all mess up)--
And that would make the frequency of chimerism among prisoners higher.
Uh, dude, given how rarely it has been seen, one can draw a logical conclusion that it is, in fact, rare.
But, given your next leap, I can see that logical conclusions ain't your strong suit:
2) BUT EVEN IF they PROVED it rare in the GENERAL population of humans-- That would not be good enough. They would need to prove that being a human chimera does not make one more prone to CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR (a reasonble suspicion, given how a chimera's DNA is all mess up)-- And that would make the frequency of chimerism among prisoners higher.
Ah, so you first go against the preponderance of the evidence to challenge a scientific assumption, and then pull something out of a dark nether region to create your own standard.
Later, gator. I prefer to debate with those who can maintain a coherent position.