Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: The big picture behind the Vatican spat
Jerusalem Post ^ | 01AUG05 | HERB KEINON

Posted on 07/31/2005 9:43:24 PM PDT by familyop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2005 9:43:24 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Ping
2 posted on 07/31/2005 9:44:03 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

this nonsense again...please, give it up...it's a dead horse


3 posted on 07/31/2005 9:46:36 PM PDT by JerseyRepub (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyRepub

To my Christian friends on here, I love you guys, but this statement by the church is ridiculous:

"The Vatican explained it couldn't condemn all attacks on Israel, because these attacks were often followed by unlawful Israeli actions."

Is the church serious with this statement, saying Israel's response to terrorism is unlawful and wrong. Come on!!!! They might be tyring a little to hard to appease Muslims.


4 posted on 07/31/2005 9:49:27 PM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike10542
"To my Christian friends on here, I love you guys, but this statement by the church..."

Keep in mind that the Catholic church is only one of the many Christian denominations and doesn't speak for the others.

5 posted on 07/31/2005 9:52:31 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop
led to an uncharacteristically strident response by the Vatican on Thursday in which it told Israel to butt out of papal statements.

Note to the Vatican: if you can't take it, don't dish it out.

6 posted on 07/31/2005 9:57:19 PM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Nonetheless, it is worrisome how Muslim appeasement has apparently crept into the largest Christian denomination in the world.
7 posted on 07/31/2005 9:59:37 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I guess I should have said Catholics, but my point was how outrageous the comment was. The Vatican is kind of like the US; I love Bush and love the new pope, but they each need new State Departments.


8 posted on 07/31/2005 10:02:51 PM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: familyop
"The Vatican explained it couldn't condemn all attacks on Israel, because these attacks were often followed by unlawful Israeli actions. "

Unless the Vatican can identify an effective “lawful” response to the unlawful terrorist attacks on Israel, I find their refusal to condemn them because of Israel’s supposed unlawful response to be incredibly weak and wrong. I don’t respect pacifism.

This is a very informative article. Thanks.

9 posted on 07/31/2005 10:03:14 PM PDT by elfman2 (This space is intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2; Mike10542
While I don't pretend to speak for all "Christians" I do believe that any reasonable person recognizes the difference between strapping a bomb on and deliberately detonating it among innocent people and Israeli soldiers bulldozing the home of a murdering terrorist.

Mike, I can disagree with your "State Department" comments. I do respect President Bush and Secretary Rice, but I think there is a time to be a statesman and a time to be a warrior. We could use a little less state craft in Israel.

10 posted on 07/31/2005 10:08:27 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JerseyRepub
To you maybe...some of us look at the Israeli situation very seriously. It isn't only the Vatican that doesn't seem to give a damn about terrorism in Israel.

Condi Rice praised Abbas for tackling terrorism, while rockets are raining down on and killing Israelis (Jews). What exactly has he done? Rather than we in the US, who should after 9/11 know better, understanding why Israel would take strong measures to combat terrorism, we praise a facilitator of that terror.

The Vatican made it clear that they do not regard terrorism against Jews in the same light as terrorism against the British or others. They equated Israel targeting those that would perpetrate terrorism against Jews, with the deliberate targeting of civilians by the Palestinians.

The fact that you see this as a dead horse, indicates that you seem to agree with that stance.

However, to this FReeper who has friends and relatives living in Israel, the Vatican pointedly ignoring terrorism in that state, is a slap in the face to all Jews. It also raises many questions of the Catholic Church, and those questions are likely to ignite a firestorm.

11 posted on 07/31/2005 10:16:03 PM PDT by sofaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

Thank you for the thanks. It was the nicest explanatory article that I could find. Other pieces published during the past few hours show much more anger from hurtful earlier history.


12 posted on 07/31/2005 10:16:42 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mike10542

I don't mind the church believing that the Israeli repsonse is wrong. After all, it believes the U.S. response to Iraq is wrong.

But that shouldn't deter it from condeming the acts that are wrong. They should condemn Palestinian suicide bombings.

This is like the Vatican justifying murder in the U.S. because it believe the death penalty is unjust. The state imposed penalty does not justify the underlying crime.

Two criminals were crucified next to Jesus. Their crimes were not absolved because of the brutality of the Romans. They stand on their own and they deserve their own condemnation and punishment.


13 posted on 07/31/2005 10:45:33 PM PDT by tbeatty (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat salad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

bttt


14 posted on 07/31/2005 10:54:09 PM PDT by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Nonetheless, it is worrisome how Muslim appeasement has apparently crept into the largest Christian denomination in the world.

Rome has had practice kowtowing to fascists. This is nothing new.

15 posted on 07/31/2005 11:10:36 PM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Barkan, in his candid remarks to the Post last week, said that Israel was trying to create a new modus operandi in the Vatican, which had, up until then, not made it a practice to condemn attacks in Israel.

Trying a run at the new pope? Ain't gonna work.

If the world would roundly condemn all attacks in Israel, this argument runs, then the level of terrorism against Israel would decline dramatically.

Considering how smart Israelis are, this has got to be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. Maybe they'll next ask the Saudis and the Iranians and the Syrians to condemn attacks on Israel instead of encouraging them. Maybe the ghost of Arafat will rise from its grave to condemn terrorism. Maybe pigs will, indeed, fly...
16 posted on 07/31/2005 11:32:19 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Well, I didn't mean to refer to just one person, but rather the mentality at the U.S. State Department and the equivalent at the Vatican. Both of their views on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict tend to equate Israel self defense and Palestinian terror as being morally equivalent. The problem is that mentality is ingrained at both places and will take some time and house cleaning to bring each view back to common sense. I think Rice is doing a good job starting the trend at our State and that the new Pope should work to do the same at the Vatican.


17 posted on 08/01/2005 12:58:58 AM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: familyop
The Vatican explained it couldn't condemn all attacks on Israel, because these attacks were often followed by unlawful Israeli actions.

DUH?!?!?

18 posted on 08/01/2005 1:02:58 AM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Maybe they'll next ask the Saudis and the Iranians and the Syrians to condemn attacks on Israel instead of encouraging them.

If Israel wants to stand up and say "you big hypocrites" to someone, they pays their money and they takes their choice.

19 posted on 08/01/2005 1:04:23 AM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone

Bulldozing the home of a terrorist who strapped on a bomb and detonated themself in the middle of a bunch of innocent people is considered unlawful in some circles apparently. I consider it great restraint.


20 posted on 08/01/2005 1:06:53 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson