The talentless and witless slanderous hag Helen Thomas didn't cite Cheney's lies to justify her slanderous accusation that he is a "liar". You know, slanderous Helen was a prostitute before her early cub reporter days, and the MSM dare not afford another whithering prostitute aka "columnist" or "anchor" who willy-nilly slanders. So far, the most infamous American politician liar is convicted perjurer Bill Clinton. Whereas, Hillary Clinton is so duplicitious she is a synthesized personification of the Hydra and Janus.
What I ask: Does anyone trust that Helen Thomas has a sound enough mind to be objective and credible? Isn't it too precarious for the uninformed among ciitzens to believe SHE comprehends what is TRUTH and knows what are FACTS?
What responsible person would bother with Helen Thomas except to unload dibbles and drabs of gossip and insinuations to bloat her high-toxicity opine?
"Liberals", like rant-rag writer Helen Thomas, inflate their hypocrisy every time they go into automatic ad hominem mode and call everyone they oppose a "liar." Obviously, transparent ad hominem ploys betray their arrested adolescence. Ill-liberal Freudian projectionists, like Dean, Gore and Durbin, et al, emit shrills echoing fascists' hystrionic "hate speech." Reminds me of script possibilities for a sequel to the broadway play & movie success THE PRODUCERS. A parody of the Democrat party bedlam: its leftist/pseudo-liberal factions in ad hominem chorus is easy work, and it ain't even fiction although outrageous.
I do wonder if ANYONE reads Helen Thomas? She is so very insignificant and certainly an obnoxious wart.