Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Warming making hurricanes stronger
AP on Yahoo ^ | 7/31/05 | Joesph Verranga - AP

Posted on 07/31/2005 1:59:05 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2005 1:59:06 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Scientists from the Al Gore Academy of Alarming Science? Of course scientist Al was pushing global "cooling".


2 posted on 07/31/2005 2:01:17 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
FR Search Results for related threads
3 posted on 07/31/2005 2:01:43 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This Massachusetts climatologist is called Kerry. I am not surprised.


4 posted on 07/31/2005 2:02:11 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"His conclusions are contingent on a very large bias removal that is large or larger than the global warming signal itself."

Rush will have fun with this tomorrow.

5 posted on 07/31/2005 2:02:53 PM PDT by Augie76 (My vote sent Daschle back to Aberdeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I would say a couple of things are contributing this...

First of all, the Pacific has been relatively quiet the past few years. Add to that there have been several Cape Verde Hurricanes, which are generally the most powerful. Doesn't necessarily mean anything, but I gaurantee that they didn't take that into account.

Secondly, the instrumentation to detect and classify hurricanes and their strengths is LIGHTYEARS ahead of where it was even 20 years ago.

third and final, since the first scientist is from MIT, you KNOW he wants to do a hit piece on W whenever he can get a chance.


6 posted on 07/31/2005 2:03:16 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Hillary only WISHES she was the Beast....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I think my heartburn is caused by global warming..

Sheesh, get back to me when its 100 degrees here for 30 days straight. Or when Maine starts growing palm trees..

7 posted on 07/31/2005 2:03:16 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Tell it to the Sun.


8 posted on 07/31/2005 2:03:49 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Here's one for the ping list.


9 posted on 07/31/2005 2:04:56 PM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Augie76
lol

btw, per a recent ap article title..

that should read "a very large boas removal " .. :)

10 posted on 07/31/2005 2:05:39 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If prolonged warming trends occurred in the past, without human contributions, it stands to reason it can happen again, or is possibly even 'still' happening.

We don't have the ability to oxygenate a planet, but are convinced we can do the reverse or similar by accident.

Put this back in Al's book where it belongs.
11 posted on 07/31/2005 2:10:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
In the Atlantic, the sea surface temperatures show a pronounced upward trend.

Really? Then why no data? It wouldn't be because there's a political agenda behind the story, would it?

12 posted on 07/31/2005 2:11:29 PM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laredo44

13 posted on 07/31/2005 2:15:12 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Mexico, the 51st state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Funny headline, Norm. Who knows, the next big study will probably be titled "Hurricanes Negatively Affect Snake Population in Florida." Like I care!


14 posted on 07/31/2005 2:17:02 PM PDT by Augie76 (My vote sent Daschle back to Aberdeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
speaking of Al eGore ,,, and his answer to The Comedy Channel ..

Current Channel :|

2004

.. the day Big Al delivered a speech on global warming , one of the coldest day in recent history in NYC.

15 posted on 07/31/2005 2:18:39 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I'm very sure the older members of this board will happily inform their fellows about the murderious hurricanes of the 1950's and 1960's. The fellow is using far too small of a data sample to fulfill his own preconceived notions as to what is happening.

Ten years ago, he might have blamed it on the hole in the Ozone, ten years from now it will be cow farts from Argentina and Brazil. Junk science, junk results - but I'll guarantee that he'll keep this publishing on his resume so he'll sound even more authoritative on his next publication.
16 posted on 07/31/2005 2:19:43 PM PDT by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

LOL I haven't seen a liberal tongue tied before.


17 posted on 07/31/2005 2:21:05 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; BibChr; Frumanchu; topcat54

The eventual end?

Burn, baby, burn.

Whether scientific or religious.

(PS: this is not an apocalyptic message.)


18 posted on 07/31/2005 2:24:49 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
I'm very sure the older members of this board will happily inform their fellows about the murderious hurricanes of the 1950's and 1960's.

I don't know if I can find a link, but I've read that it's pretty well established that Atlantic hurricanes go in approximately 40-year cycles: 20 years relatively mild, 20 years relatively harsh. I first read about this maybe 10 years ago in the WSJ and I've seen several articles on it in the intervening years.

19 posted on 07/31/2005 2:29:40 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Actually the decade of 1941-1950 is the grandaddy of hurricane decades when it comes to US strikes.
@4 US strikes that decade with 10 of them major (cat 3, 4 or 5).

No other decade comes close post 1950. However from 1876-1890 there were 5 years with better than 10 hurricanes in each year. This was the busiest period of time on record. Another poster above pointed out that in years past before technology and the Weather Channel!...many probably occurred without notice.


20 posted on 07/31/2005 2:40:35 PM PDT by jsh3180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson