To: Lurker 50001
Once the US v Raisch case (medical marijuana) was decided, they didn't even bother to hear US v Stewart (Bob Stewart and Maadi-Griffin) which was next on the docket.
68 posted on
08/01/2005 7:23:11 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
(Say goodnight, Grace.)
To: tacticalogic
Oh yeah, Mr. Stewart. The felon who was found to be in possession of thirty-one firearms, including five machine guns machined and assembled by him.
All for personal use, of course. None of our business, fer sure. They'll never enter the commerce stream -- never.
You might have picked a better case with which to challenge the law on second amendment grounds. I thought the federal AWB was a good one.
Then again, the USSC might have ruled that assault weapons, including full-auto, were constitutional (in that they were part of a militia), but handguns were not used by the common militia soldier.
Oops.
To: tacticalogic; Lurker 50001; All
Once the US v Raisch case (medical marijuana) was decided, they didn't even bother to hear US v Stewart (Bob Stewart and Maadi-Griffin) which was next on the docket.
68 tacticalogic
Oh yeah, Mr. Stewart. The felon who was found to be in possession of thirty-one firearms, including five machine guns machined and assembled by him.
All for personal use, of course. None of our business, fer sure. They'll never enter the commerce stream -- never.
Oops.
74 robertpaulsen
Oops indeed. -- FR's foremost gun grabber has 'outed' himself again by inferring it is his business to see that those evil full autos "never enter the commerce stream".
76 posted on
08/02/2005 6:58:57 AM PDT by
musanon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson