To: bill1952
I have a self-imposed ban on discussing the JSF, except to repeatedly predict that it will never reach operational status.
It is fruitless to discuss it with some who feel they know better, as their jobs might depend on me being wrong. I'm not, but it will take time for that to be proved.
As an airframe, the JSF has few benefits over current technology. It is not as stealthy as the F-22, barely more maneuverable as your average F-16, and eats so much gas, it cant carry much to the fight. It is not that it is not fuel efficient, its that there just aint nowhere to put much gas.
19 posted on
07/31/2005 10:49:50 AM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
Thanks. I'll remember about your ban. ;^)
20 posted on
07/31/2005 11:11:36 AM PDT by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Pukin Dog
It is not as stealthy as the F-22, barely more maneuverable as your average F-16, and eats so much gas, it cant carry much to the fight. It is not that it is not fuel efficient, its that there just aint nowhere to put much gas. Do your comments apply to ALL variants of the JSF, or are they limited to the STOVL version?
25 posted on
07/31/2005 11:55:11 AM PDT by
Tallguy
To: Pukin Dog
Ahhh, points to discuss. I can see why you would say it ain't gonna make it operational. As a civilian I keep seeing this neat plane every now and then and ??what?? Techwise I think they can do the engine/vectoring thing; need mogas or nogas.
54 posted on
07/31/2005 9:48:19 PM PDT by
Atchafalaya
(When you're there that's the best!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson