Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Witnesses: Tasered boy posed no threat
ChicagoSunTimes ^ | 7-31-05 | DAVE NEWBART

Posted on 07/31/2005 9:20:58 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
This is where some professionalism by the officer needs to come into play. Period (IMO). We have soldiers using ten times better judgment/consideration in the middle of a fierce combat zone.

The officer should be out of a job (or at the verly least suspended for a period of time and then put on a desk job).

And this kid shouldn't be allowed to sue! - Everyone move on -

1 posted on 07/31/2005 9:20:59 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: DevSix
This is where some professionalism by the officer needs to come into play.

Why? He had a taser to play with and apparently no restrictions on its use. After all, those things cost a lot of money. Makes sense to use them every chance you get. Or maybe this is "professionalism" in this police department.

3 posted on 07/31/2005 9:30:03 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
Were the police called to this home over recent actions by this kid or do they just hang around most homes with tasers?
4 posted on 07/31/2005 9:33:51 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
The 14 year old said "Go ahead shoot me with your toy gun."

Where's the problem? The kid wanted to be shot - enough said.

5 posted on 07/31/2005 9:36:49 AM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul

You missed his point. Common sense and professionalism has flown out the window in the Law Enforcement arena. Police used to SETTLE disputes, they didn't HAVE to or FEEL they had arrest people or draw weapons all the time. The taser is becoming an excuse to use such force because it is considered "non-lethal". The result, no common sense anymore.


6 posted on 07/31/2005 9:37:14 AM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul

Maybe the cop should just grab the little fiend. When it turns out the kid bites him and has aids, well gee, I hope the officer is OK.

Oh but the kid is already bleeding. Better not grab him. Then of course there's the always the baton...


7 posted on 07/31/2005 9:38:30 AM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

(IMO) I am suspicious of the way this whole thing was reported. The poor innocent emotionally challenged yout' was just sitting there innocently minding his own business, when all of the sudden, Barney Fife kicks the door sown and tazers him.. uh uh. I would need more info before would jump to condemn the L.E. Officer involved.


8 posted on 07/31/2005 9:42:29 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
MOST HOMES?

The incident happened after the boy went into a rage at the residential center in February when a staff member took his baseball cap. He smashed windows and allegedly pushed staff members. He then refused treatment for his bleeding hand. But there is no evidence the boy was under the influence of illegal drugs, Harris said.

Nope, just your normal 240 pound kid acting out..

By the time emergency personnel arrived, he was sitting on a couch in an office and had calmed down, depositions show, although some witnesses said he was still agitated. He refused medical treatment even after Fire Department paramedics and a police officer arrived. When Lopez arrived at the scene, he had a Taser in his hand, witnesses said. The boy asked Lopez what he planned to do with the weapon, the boy's therapist, Alvin Hill, said in a deposition. Lopez allegedly responded, "We're going to put some juice in you,'' Hill recalled. In response, the boy said, "Go ahead, shoot me with your toy gun,'' testified Ulich campus supervisor Wayne Riley, a former probation officer.

Well, here you go. You had paramedics, the fire department, and FINALLY the police. The kid required medical treatment, and then GAVE CONSENT. Though, possibly, a minor is incapable of giving consent. But this kid has problems that the taser did not create..

9 posted on 07/31/2005 9:42:48 AM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (When the disbeliever sees this, he will say, 'How nice if I was also turned into sand.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
Where's the problem? The kid wanted to be shot - enough said.

Yeah, but the kid is a retard. And it looks like the cop might be one too.

10 posted on 07/31/2005 9:43:00 AM PDT by MRMEAN (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of congress; but I repeat myself. - Mark Tw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jerry K.
Mouthing off to an Officer is asking for trouble

That is where the professionalism of the Officer needs to come into play - Using a taz, is not it.

A youth mouthing off is where maturity needs to come into play - and the immaturity of "you can't mouth off to me...I'm a big bad police officer" needs to go out the window.

Again, we have 18-22 year old young men in Iraq (in a fierce combat zone) showing more professionalism than this officer.

11 posted on 07/31/2005 9:47:53 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

Everyone on deathrow is retarded as well.

Sometimes, retardation is a after-the-fact media diagnosis or familial excuse.

Obstinate, trouble maker, commits crime = retarded.
Drug-addicts, Sociopaths, scofflaws, gangtsers.. The instant they get into trouble they become "Challenged".

I have empathy, but I'm not gullible.

Of course, this could be a mistake on the Officer's part, I'm not ruling that out, I just want to point out that we are duped by the "retardation" ploy on a regular basis.


12 posted on 07/31/2005 9:49:12 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6
Nope, just your normal 240 pound kid acting out..

Incorrect, this is what the foolish officer on scene reported - (actual facts show the kid was 175 pounds...meaning the officers judgment was off by almost 40% of the kids true weight!)

13 posted on 07/31/2005 9:49:35 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

According to the article He was posturing, threatening with hands and feet.


14 posted on 07/31/2005 9:50:16 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

Add my name to those 6 witnesses to testify against those mean old rich poo-leece. I don't know jack about this case but don't hesitate to axe me whut's be happenin to this po chile. By the way I do get to share the lawsuit money, don't I?


15 posted on 07/31/2005 9:51:46 AM PDT by BTCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capn TrVth
(IMO) I am suspicious of the way this whole thing was reported. The poor innocent emotionally challenged yout' was just sitting there innocently minding his own business, when all of the sudden, Barney Fife kicks the door sown and tazers him.. uh uh. I would need more info before would jump to condemn the L.E. Officer involved.

Actually this isn't how the story was reported at all (read it) - So wy the need for strawman in order for you to try and make your case that the officer did nothing wrong.

He most certainly acted without the professionalism we are demanding of 18 to 20 year old kids in Iraq (a fierce combat zone). The officer's actions and comments are those of an officer that should be out of work (or suspended and then on to a desk job).

16 posted on 07/31/2005 9:52:19 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BTCM

LOL


17 posted on 07/31/2005 9:52:41 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6

Unless this kid was 7' 2" at that weight, he had poor eating habits, probable high blood pressure and hypertension.

Based on what you are saying, their wasn't a lot else the police could do and this was a reasonable use of force in this situation.

Are the police to allow this giant kid to kill someone else first?
If this kid was breaking windows out in a Home, that flying glass could have killed other kids.
Also, lots of over violence he was displaying could have killed others.

Despite the age, if this kid was being really dangerous to others, it is best he died first before others.
He could have always cooperated and avoided the whole thing.

I see no reason to sue or go after the police for anything here.
Maybe they do want to change procedures and put nets in the cars to throw over some of these people.
I know the issue with a net is you can't search the person well and that is also a danger to the police.

Everything is too complicated these days.


18 posted on 07/31/2005 9:53:08 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

"I would need more info before would jump to condemn the L.E. Officer involved."

-Nuff said.


19 posted on 07/31/2005 9:53:52 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Capn TrVth
According to the article He was posturing, threatening with hands and feet.

According to the officer in question thy child was acting in this manner (an officer who also misreported the child's weight by over 40%!) - An additionally 4 witnesses (adults) said the child was doing no such behavior (toward the officer - other than running his mouth a little).

20 posted on 07/31/2005 9:54:18 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson