Your reply is non-responsive, and implys that you have an affinity for Marxist dogma. Anything else we should know in advance?
It implies that you can't refute the fact that communist goals include free trade:
rom the 1963 Congressional Record, Communist Goals
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
BTW, cafta was about more than just free trade...that much is obvious. To define "free trade" doesn't take 2,400 pages
-----
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1436446/posts
“This agreement will allow foreign companies to challenge our immigration policies in international CAFTA tribunals and argue that the laws impede their ability to access the U.S. service sector,” said Tancredo. “That would force Congress to change our immigration laws, or subject our businesses to trade sanctions.”
“If this agreement is approved, the ‘exclusive’ power of Congress to regulate immigration policy will be subjugated to the whim of international tribunals – the same way that Congress ceded its once supreme Constitutional authority to ‘regulate commerce with foreign nations’ to the WTO.”
Check this out. I believe I have either a bona-fide Marxist on my hands, or someone who is incapable of understanding that the Communist Party "platform" circa 1963 incorporates Marxist thought circa 1848, and that he or she agrees with both.