The male can affect whether the baby will have his DNA, but not whether a woman who wants a baby is going to get pregnant. Especially for low IQ, low social-status young women, getting pregnant out-of-wedlock is socially acceptable or even advantageous, and economically very advantageous. That's the problem. Politicians demagoguery about "deadbeat dads" is a diversion from the problem, ie part of the problem.
Good post. We need to end the "Baby Momma" chic social status.
Well the point is, if a man, any man, does not want to be responsible for a child and all that comes with having children, he has a choice. He is choosing to have sex and is choosing to use protection himself, or become a sperm donor by not protecting himself.
Low IQ and low social-status is just another excuse for bring children into the world. People that try to justify this to being the reason for the out of wedlock pregnancy is just adding to the problem.
Parts of our society need to quit making excuses and stop making it socially acceptable or even advantageous, and economically very advantageous.
By making sperm donors pay and or do not pay unwed mother until father or fathers names are given and proven through DNA. I bet the low IQ will go up real quick in a lot of these women and men.
Now the custody of a born child between two willing unmarried adults is another matte.