Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA: Another Shuttle Could Launch Soon
AP ^ | 7/29/05 | Marcia Dunn

Posted on 07/29/2005 1:25:32 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: KC_for_Freedom

This isn't some guy mixing the stuff up in his backyard. The guys who make the foam are high-powered research chemists, and it's a pretty good bet they wrote down how to mix up the foam. The reason it was stopped was that it took freon to make it, and the greenies didn't like that.

As to whether it needed the President or not, Clinton seemed to think so, since he wrote the order to switch formulations.

On top of that, I know this is NASA, but I highly doubt that they were as imprecise with their design specifications as you say:

"Thus they made something that worked, may not have understood it fully, and so when they couldn't make it anymore they accepted that the new process would also work. When it did not, they may have tweeked it a little, but since it is also up to the subjective technique of the applier, they probably considered the process to be variable and you get what you get."

Who do you think these guys are? A bunch of carpenters who do rocketry in their spare time? "Yep, clem, this latest batch of goop oughta spread on that there tank better than the last stuff did. Won't turn yer hands green, neither."


Sheesh.


41 posted on 07/29/2005 2:07:48 PM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
I can assure you that the foam was mixed and applied in a very quality ensured process. My father worked at KSC for 33 years and visited the plant in Michoud on numerous times. The foam was applied with a robotic machine while the tank was horizontal and rotating. Areas around the struts and some other places were done by hand however.

I think this has been an ongoing problem and Columbia brought it to everyones attention.

42 posted on 07/29/2005 2:08:25 PM PDT by Normal4me (I'm sweating like a muslim wearing a backpack on a London subway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
That picture doesn't make sense. 18 times speed of light? How did that happen?

You'll have to back to 1840 and ask them.

43 posted on 07/29/2005 2:09:21 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Seems they put the insulation for my water heater inside the tank. Why not inside the external fuel tank? Seems the foam would have some protection by the wall of the tank (fiber glass?) during assent.

L.P.
44 posted on 07/29/2005 2:10:06 PM PDT by Lagrange Point
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
That picture doesn't make sense. 18 times speed of light? How did that happen?

You hire an large number of chimps to type captions at CNN. When you find one with some scientific knowledge, you shoot him so he can't spread it.

45 posted on 07/29/2005 2:10:50 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
BTW, does color of foam really matter?

The foam was always orange. Before the early launches the foam and tank were painted white, but that added about a ton of weight which was better used for payload.

I don't know if painting the foam would make it hold together better.

46 posted on 07/29/2005 2:14:29 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sergio
Revert back to the old insulating foam formula and be done with it.

The one that the enviro-wackos were opposed to?

47 posted on 07/29/2005 2:14:31 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
I'm not saying it didn't happen, I find it funny that there was not one mention of the change on the Discover program. They showed all kinds of tests and changes on the tank foam and different ways of applying it and no mention of the previous style foam, not that I'm accusing them of an agenda mind you...

Oh yeah, one other thing, the woman who was in charge of the tile repair project was more of a camera hog than a project manager. Then when she argued with some engineer at the place that made the goo, I just had to laugh. I've had PM's that were that lame. That's why it's always better to be you're own PM for your own project assignments.

48 posted on 07/29/2005 2:15:27 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dead
I’m not sure of the temperature, but I know that they’re going very very fast.

I've always wondered why the Shuttle didn't have headlights....If they turned on the headlights, they'd crash into the light beams.....

49 posted on 07/29/2005 2:16:11 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I never knew that. Thx


50 posted on 07/29/2005 2:16:42 PM PDT by theDentist (The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
hmmm . . . yeah, I see your point. Maybe we could use the enviro-wackos as insulation. Naww, they'd just fall off too.

Best Regards

Sergio
51 posted on 07/29/2005 2:22:30 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lagrange Point

Some reasons---The inside contains lots of cabling, struts, electronics, etc. The skin is only about 1/16" thick and the salt air would corroded the aluminum in no time flat.


52 posted on 07/29/2005 2:26:02 PM PDT by Normal4me (I'm sweating like a muslim wearing a backpack on a London subway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
...some cheap OTS item and it turned out to work better than the expensive stuff...

Reminds me of a mechanic that told me to buy cheap cans of rust proofing if I had a problem.

Also, I read a computer article about a guy modding his pc, probably for overclocking. He didn't like the noise and
used that spray foam caulk to try to insulate the fan noise. I think he went through a couple of iterations, one that
bent the case outwards from the foam expansion, and the other was touching the foam to "form" it into place.
Touching it collasped the bubbles, and made it hard as a rock, requiring something just short of a jackhammer to
remove (since no bubbles, no voids, great sound transmission).

The moral of the story is to use the appropriate material for the requirements of the application.

53 posted on 07/29/2005 2:28:55 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
Heck, wasn't there some incident recently where some high-dollar program used some cheap OTS item and it turned out to work better than the expensive stuff they had had custom-made for the program? Maybe they can use that spray-on foam caulk to insulate the tank. You know, the stuff you use to fill spaces in walls and make "custom" shipping padding?

This stuff never comes off.

54 posted on 07/29/2005 2:32:18 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living affront to Islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

You are Correct, return to the Freon Based foam that worked Excellently. This is not the time to be Environmentally Correct, the Original Foam worked Perfectly because it was and is less brittle.This new stuff they have been trying to make work since 1998 a product of the Clinton/Gore dogma.Lets have it changed back to the original specifications NOW!


55 posted on 07/29/2005 2:32:37 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (Facts don't Bother the Left! GOD BLESS OUR President Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

Yeah, but they're not going THAT fast (3.348 million miles per second)! How about 18 times the speed of my ex-wife in school zones.


56 posted on 07/29/2005 2:38:46 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dead

Man, is that CNN Headline Correct???????or a photoshop??
Hope it is correct, then it shows how dumb CNN is!!Shuttle traveling 18 times faster than the speed of LIGHT!!!!!
Sorta blows Einstein and all We know outa the water.CNN was to dumb to know the difference between the speed of Sound and the speed of Light. WOW!


57 posted on 07/29/2005 2:44:28 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (Facts don't Bother the Left! GOD BLESS OUR President Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me

Thanks, where I worked in LMT the mixing and stirring and even the exact amounts were kept to loose tolerances so they did not have to throw out a close mix. But sometimes this led to vastly different properties from one day to the next and one tech to the next. Using a robot mixer is a good idea providing the temperature, humitity, and quantities and lots and age of materials are also controlled. Using composites, or resins or anything that required all these things be controlled was usually just too much for our guys.


58 posted on 07/29/2005 3:04:01 PM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

There was a young lady named bright,
Who traveled much faster than light.
She started one day
in a relative way,
and returned on the previous night.


59 posted on 07/29/2005 3:57:08 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot
Uh, not quite.

Internal NASA reports obtained by The Associated Press describe damage during some of the earlier shuttle missions, caused by foam from the bipod area. Columbia suffered damage to three insulating tiles during a June 1992 liftoff when a large chunk of foam from the bipod _ 26-by-10 inches _ fell off.

After the mission, NASA determined that the shuttle fleet had suffered an unprecedented amount of serious tile damage over 18 preceding flights.

60 posted on 07/29/2005 4:27:17 PM PDT by Normal4me (I'm sweating like a muslim wearing a backpack on a London subway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson