Adult Stem Cells |
Embryonic Stem Cells |
Cancers: |
NONE |
ReferencesThe Facts - Prentice, D. "Adult Stem Cells" Appendix K in Monitoring Stem Cell Research: A Report of the President's Council on Bioethics (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2004), 309-346.The Facts - Addendum, October 2004 |
Trouble is, it's an extremely complicated field, and even the top researchers who specialize in it don't pretend to know what types of research and techniques will lead to what kinds of medical advances. Most want the freedom to pursue all avenues, and steer their research in whatever direction looks most promising for the particular condition they're hoping to treat.
Any time you hear somebody claim that they know that adult stem cells will work just as well or better, or that they know there's no way to make any significant medical advances without using embryonic stem cells, you can be sure you're listening to an ignorant ideological ranter.
I know a bit about this stuff, and can only say one thing for sure: the line between an adult stem cell which is being manipulated for medical purposes and an embryo which could grow into a full-fledged human being is getting thinner every day, and will fade away quite soon -- almost certainly within the next 10 years. As soon as researchers get an adult stem cell to the point where it can develop into any type of cell or organ needed for a treatment (and I'm virtually certain they will), they'll also be sitting on a cell which can develop into the whole package. It's just a question of which switches they choose to flip. So they've got this cell that came from an adult stem cell, that's beginning to divide on its own, and if they put it in the right medium for a few days, and then drop it into a woman's uterus it will grow into the whole package and come out wailing for a nipple to suck on. But if the flip the switches for "turn into a kidney only", it turns into a kidney only and saves someone from a shortened life filled with endless hours hooked up to a dialysis machine. Did they kill a "baby" when they chose to flip the "kidney only" switch? Or is a clump of cells that has the potential to become a baby not a "baby" if it came from an adult stem cell?
There was news out today of another important discovery by Harvard researcher Jonathan Tilly. He has discovered stem cells in bone marrow (of mice at this point, but most mouse things turn out to apply to humans too) that can travel to the ovaries and start producing new eggs. He's only tried this with females, and only inside an actual mouse body at this point. But it's not hard to see how there may be comparable stem cells which can produce sperm. Or even that the same cells could produce both, if injected into a male and a female, or if put in two petri dishes with the right broth. If you take two adult stem cells and put them in a petri dish and they hook up and start dividing into a regular embryo, is that a clump of "adult stem cells" or is it a clump of "embryonic stem cells"?