Hmm...
With this line of reasoning, we should be harvesting organs from death row inmates since they will be discarded anyway.
Maybe we should look at the ethics of creating embryos in fertility clinics that may end up being discarded.
These same clinics will selectively abort multiple fetuses that result from fertility therapy since the mother to be intends to only have one child.
I guess these are babies that will be discarded anyway.
Ironically the left will come up with more arguments to abort healthy babies (for their cells) than defenses for aborting defective babies (would their stem cells be as healthy?)
It is genetic cannibalism.
Nice try, but if you don't see the difference between forcibly removing peolpe's organs and thus killing them, and using something about to be thrown in the trash, there's no reasoning with you.
I know it makes you all feel so high and mighty with these meandering assumptions about other people's views of abortion, but it's just silly and beside the point. You all have your fun, now, but I'll stick to those posts which stick to the actual point.
We gots ta' have the quality people in line FIRST, to give it all up for the health of humanity.