Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nsmart

Is it true that NASA didn't change the foam at all for this launch? What on earth is different about this shuttle flight than the one that failed?


2 posted on 07/29/2005 5:11:40 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Dogs rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Thebaddog

I'm not rocket scientist, hee hee, but to my knowledge they only put more cameras on it so the astronauts would know they were in deep doo doo.


4 posted on 07/29/2005 5:14:59 AM PDT by nsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog
Is it true that NASA didn't change the foam at all for this launch? What on earth is different about this shuttle flight than the one that failed?

NASA made lots of changes, including eliminating foam from some areas where foam separation would be particulalry risky to the shuttle.

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/112301main_114_pk_july05.pdf <- 8.9 Mb "Press Kit"

The above URL contains a very good summary of the changes to the external tank and other aspects of the mission, most of which is aimed at improving safety. There were LOTS of changes, but a return to the old "sticking" foam was not one of them.

6 posted on 07/29/2005 5:18:15 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Thebaddog
Is it true that NASA didn't change the foam at all for this launch? What on earth is different about this shuttle flight than the one that failed?

YES. ..On this flight, they applied the "Freon-Free" Crap w/ "more" care.

28 posted on 07/29/2005 11:01:38 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson