Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prime Choice
Eating such animals is a commonly-accepted practice.

One which we describe with terms like "barbaric," "primitive," "savage," and a wealth of others I can't post here. My question is this: How is the eating of pigs more enlightened and morally justifiable than the eating of dogs?

Falling back on the ol' our-culture-does-it = morally right breaks down for these types of issues. (Our "culture" permits abortion, does that make it right??) The Bible condemns it, as do most moral philosphers (for different reasons of course.)

34 posted on 07/29/2005 12:26:35 AM PDT by Petronius (Hunter S. Thompson: Shine On You Crazy Diamond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Petronius
One which we describe with terms like "barbaric," "primitive," "savage," and a wealth of others I can't post here.

I guess I'm not part of that "we" to which you refer. Me, I heard of it and said, "Oh...that's gross!" And when I heard of people who ate grasshoppers, I said, "Oh...that's gross!"

It was only after I learned that veal was produced by raising calves in crates (and the really expensive veal was harvested in utero) that I actually ever used the terms "barbaric," "savage," and "immoral."

66 posted on 07/29/2005 8:14:41 AM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson