I missed your post #27 completely until just now. We are in more agreement than not.
I thought that might be the case. That is why I tried to elaborate a little bit more.
You seem to agree with those that claim that voting against a nominee for Supreme Court when one has already voted for that candidate for a lower post would open one to criticism. I think that such criticism is unjustified and that such an action can be explained rationally.
Thankfully, the Republicans seem to be in a position to kick the Demoncrats in the face, politically. This is similar to the situation with the "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Firearms Act". The Demoncrats completely lose their composure and are force to lie blatantly in their attempts to stop the legislation. I can't help but believe that there are Demoncrats on the fringe who view this with distaste and who, like myself years ago, can hardly wait for the Registrar's Office to open up to change their voter registration. Who would want to be associated with these vile creatures?