Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Family sues SWAT team after raid on their home (Oops... wrong house)
The Daily Herald ^ | July 28, 2005 | Michael Rigert

Posted on 07/28/2005 8:42:34 AM PDT by skyman

A family says on a quiet May evening members of the Utah County SWAT team erroneously invaded their Springville home and roughed them up without cause.

The next day, the Chidester family, including Lawrence, his wife Emily and their adult son Larry, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Utah County and six SWAT team members.

According to court documents, the Chidesters say the SWAT team arrived on the street outside their home May 25 at approximately 10:30 p.m. They say the officers then proceeded to man-handle them in the execution of a search warrant -- albeit for the wrong address. The police unit's intended target, the suit claims, was the residence next door.

"Larry Chidester was asleep in his residence when he heard a loud bang or crash outside and exited to investigate the source of the noise," court documents say.

He observed Utah County SWAT team members departing their police vehicle and heading toward their neighbor's home. The sound he had heard was flash-bang devices detonated by the officers. However when SWAT team members saw Larry, they went after him, the suit claims.

"The officer pointed his firearm at Larry and started running towards him, yelling, 'There's one!,' " the document states.

Despite the fact that Larry had his hands in the air and told the officer repeatedly "I'm not resisting," the suit states the SWAT member continued to run over or tackle him, "and shoved his face into the ground and rocks."

The suit claims Larry Chidester was later transported to the emergency room at Mountain View Hospital in Payson to be treated for injuries.

Two officers then kicked open a side door of the home and entered Lawrence Chidester's bedroom as he was dressing, according to the suit.

"A law enforcement officer grabbed Lawrence and threw him to the floor ... the officer held a firearm to the back of Lawrence's head in the presence of his wife, Emily Chidester," the documents say.

Afterward, when the family was questioned about their names and address, the suit claims SWAT team members "admitted ... they were in the wrong house and they had made a mistake."

The Chidesters said the addresses of both homes were clearly marked by curbside mail boxes.

In the federal suit, the Chidesters claim that the members of the Utah County Sheriff's Office were "grossly negligent ... and acted with deliberate indifference" of their rights. They say the SWAT team members had no probable cause for their arrest or detention.

The family is seeking an undisclosed amount in damages to be determined at trial.

Though Utah County Sheriff Jim Tracy said the Chidester home was not the SWAT team's original objective, he said the Chidesters became involved in the raid "as an ancillary issue."

"The warrant was for the house nextdoor but in the service of that warrant they became involved ... they had contact with us," Tracy said.

He said he could not comment on the specifics of the lawsuit since he had not yet reviewed it.

"We dispute the accuracy of their version of the events," Tracy said, regarding what's been reported to date about the nature of the incident.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; donutwatch; fascist; jackbootedthugs; jbt; leosgonewild; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last
To: Mack the knife; cowboyway; MEGoody
Good pick up. This was not a case of getting the wrong address. They raided the right address to begin with. Then they raided a house with no warrant and no exigent circumstances.

See post #98

161 posted on 07/29/2005 12:02:58 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway
You're insulting all cops, questioning their intelligence and questioning if we even need them. Do any of you guys actually know any cops? Do you think they are perfect people?
I know quite a few cops; only one truly honest cop.

And even he has the trademark "Us versus them" attitude. You're either family or you are one of them, and the moment they run your plates they know whether you are family or not.

162 posted on 07/29/2005 12:49:58 AM PDT by Nonesuch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: skyman

There ought to be a law that all SWAT team members be ex-military with training night raid tactics and all this stupid stuff would come to a halt.
No! No! NO! NO! That is exactly the problem.

Ex-military types are trained for military situations where the rules of engagement are ... when in doubt, kill the enemy. There is a presumption that anyone you see will be trying to kill you. If he has something in his hand, shoot to kill - it might be a gun (and not a cell phone). If you make a mistake, call it "collateral damage" and go home. THIS IS NOT THE CULTURE I WANT FROM MY "POLICE"!! This is the culture that led Horiuchi to take a sniper shot at Ruby Ridge and kill a woman holding a baby! This is the culture that led to the Waco massacre!

Apply the quality culture to this situation for a moment - if there is a serious problem, it is probably not the fault of the men, but the fault of the system. What is the system?

Let's start with "no-knock warrants". They were originally justified because perps would get rid of evidence if the police knocked on the door. Bookies would touch a cigar to flash paper and burn up the booking slips. Dealers would flush drugs down the toilet. To fix this problem, police requested "no-knock" warrants to stop the perps from destroying the evidence.

So police did this -- and found that drug dealers and some bookies worry about being robbed, so they have guns, and are ready to use them instantly against people who bust in on them. When police busted in the door, some of them got shot by the perps. Soooo...

The police decided that, rather than get shot, they should have SWAT teams to bust in with overwhelming force and "secure" the situation. When some of them get shot, they go get taught by the military (OK, the military teaches the FBI, and the FBI teaches the SWAT teams), so you get militarization of the police; and the tactics are based on the fact that you shoot to kill anyone who has something in their hand that MIGHT be a danger to you when you surprise them in their own home. So when you learn the tactics, you absorb the culture - suprise the perps, and kill them under the slightest perceived danger.

After a few perps get shot by these guys, some bad guys decide they are going to get even -- so the SWAT team now wear their black ninja suits and ski masks so you are unable to find out who they are, and thus further reduces their sense of accountability.

The culture is re-inforced by the fact that not a single police officer who has killed a citizen this way has been convicted of manslaughter or murder; the Police management support their people. It's just collateral damage. This happens much more than we would like to believe -- read the "Whack and Stack" pages of Sierra Times and become appalled.

Conclusion: the system is wrong. Solution: change the system.

For example: Only use SWAT teams AFTER shots have been fired at police, or in hostage situations, where the presumtion of guilt is more applicable. And eliminate "no knock" warrants.


156 posted on 07/28/2005 7:39:43 PM EDT by Mack the knife
___________

Best post of the day ...... can't be said loud enough.

And when the boys we are training in Iraq come home ... look out for more "population control" as they join up with local LEOs.

It's a sad day when people tell their children not to attract the attention of law enforcment... yes , I have told mine that.


163 posted on 07/29/2005 5:00:24 AM PDT by THEUPMAN (#### comment deleted by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skyman

This is what you get when you have LE going military. I hope the family wins big time. Cops don't need to have machine guns nor do they need to play Navy SEAL with the citizens of this country.

The militarization of law enforcement must stop.

Mike


164 posted on 07/29/2005 5:08:38 AM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226
Cops don't need to have machine guns nor do they need to play Navy SEAL with the citizens of this country.

Just for the sake of argument, why do they need any guns? No tasers, no pepper spray. Just a night stick. Maybe.

165 posted on 07/29/2005 5:26:49 AM PDT by cowboyway (My heroes have always been cowboys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: skyman
Did anyone else wonder what they were doing outside with flashbangs? I'm not an expert but I thought they were used to disorient people within a reasonable range. There's no way that Larry's so slow that they flashbanged the right house, went in, subdued anyone there, searched, did whatever arresting they had to do and made it back out before Larry reached the front door. So what (or who) were they trying to disorient outside?
166 posted on 07/29/2005 5:35:06 AM PDT by fmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
"No apologies. Gruff. Left with threats to the effect of, "We're watching you! When you see Mr. XYZ, you better call us."

I know I would be sent to jail but that cop would have had a bullet in the back of his head.

167 posted on 07/29/2005 5:38:00 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (I have the biggest organ in my town {;o))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Gordon Liddy has had some thoughts on this sort of incident. He says (and I agree) that this is what happens when you have police forming "paramilitary" units. i.e. local cops playing soldier. They think they are rambos, but they really are......


168 posted on 07/29/2005 5:43:10 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
"The city says the officers have been punished but refuse to say what the punishement was since it is a personnal matter."

I cannot believe how many times our corrupt government uses this excuse. WTF, we pay the payroll "IT IS OUR BUSINESS". Why do we let them get away with this?

169 posted on 07/29/2005 5:44:02 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (I have the biggest organ in my town {;o))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

LE needs firearms... They do run across armed badguys. However, there is NO need for any civilian law enforcement agency to deploy with select fire or full auto weapons. There simply is no situation within the realm of possibility where full auto is needed or should be used.

Mike


170 posted on 07/29/2005 5:46:12 AM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

It is indeed refreshing to see so many posters realize that the militarization of civilian police must cease.


171 posted on 07/29/2005 5:46:59 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (illegally posting on an expired tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

I spent three years training LE on weapons systems... I asked in every class for a single scenario where a subgun would be better employed than a handgun or a semi auto carbine.

I never got an answer. I'd love to see a federal mandate banning the use of MG's by LE in civilian law enforcement in the US. Wonder if it will ever happen.

Mike


172 posted on 07/29/2005 5:50:10 AM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway
"And these comments about brown-shirts, well, that's just over the top. These guys are our neighbors, boys. They got wives and kids and mortgages. They ain't brown-shirts. "

Very true and needs to be kept in mind (I don't always do that) however, when they behave like brown-shirts, fire away.

173 posted on 07/29/2005 5:50:13 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (I have the biggest organ in my town {;o))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

"LE needs firearms..."

But they don't need tasers because they are abusing them daily. In the link below there is a story of a guy having a seizure tasered to death by Gwinnett county sheriffs in Georgia. There are similar cases of this abuse throughout the nation.

Read the alarming (though few) responses there. It's truly scary how some people can so readily justify murder by civilian police.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418906/posts


174 posted on 07/29/2005 5:56:43 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (illegally posting on an expired tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I nominate you for poster of the day.

Still laughing.....


175 posted on 07/29/2005 6:20:03 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Just one more reason to hate the government....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Personally, I think that in this day of possible terrorism and all that, SWAT teams have their place. They don't necessarily need to be doing every single raid, which seems to be the practice these days....

however, not EVERY single town needs a SWAT team.


176 posted on 07/29/2005 6:21:54 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Proud member of Planet ManRam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

It crossed my mind. I literally had to pray later for God to help me forgive him to prevent me from hunting his butt down.

I have many, many friends who are cops. I respect what they do. Most do it out of a sense of duty, akin to soldiers.

And then there are the idiots.


177 posted on 07/29/2005 7:12:35 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Most do it out of a sense of duty, akin to soldiers.

Unfortunately, being a cop is one profession where those who grow up dreaming of being one are ones that shouldn't be cops.

178 posted on 07/29/2005 9:00:53 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
No, I'm saying perhaps someone else instigated it by giving bad information to the police, then contacted the family about the lawsuit. ACLU and other such groups wouldn't be above that sort of thing.

Tin foil alert

179 posted on 07/29/2005 9:01:44 AM PDT by jmc813 ("Small-government conservative" is a redundancy, and "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: skyman

I hope this family not just gets the money but pushes hard for hard punishment and public humiliation for the folks responsible for this "raid."

With humiliation the police will think twice before trying this again.


180 posted on 07/29/2005 8:08:04 PM PDT by rasblue (What would Barry Goldwater do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson