Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Evans
That isn't true. It is actually less radioactive than plutonium

I think the author is instead postulating that it is extremely dangerous because it's much easier to make an a-bomb with it than plutonium.

70 posted on 07/28/2005 2:26:24 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy; Zeroisanumber
I think the author is instead postulating that it is extremely dangerous because it's much easier to make an a-bomb with it than plutonium.

I suppose that's one way to look at it.

But there is a form of uranium that he may be thinking of. Not HEU but U-233. The critical mass is less than half that of HEU and it is easier to make because it doesn't require the enormously expensive enriching process.

It is produced by irradiating thorium in a nuclear reactor and fortunately that makes it radioactive to the point where it can't be handled.

74 posted on 07/28/2005 2:47:20 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson