Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: APFel
Population centers were targets all throughout the second World War for both the Allied and the Axis forces.

Indeed. That's why I said it was the final act of that war that made such targeting acceptable.

Aside from that, the bombs weren't meant to (as a reason for the bombs) destroy the population of two cities. Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were important manufacturing centers for the Japanese war effort. If the US wanted to simply annihilate Japanese people, they could have selected better targets.

One could find a rationalization to drop the bombs on any city other than to destroy the people living therein - manufacturing, food supply, energy production, whatever. To follow your argument, if we did not want to "annihilate" civilians, we could have found better targets.
16 posted on 07/28/2005 8:02:37 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: BikerNYC
To follow your argument, if we did not want to "annihilate" civilians, we could have found better targets.

For example...?

APf

19 posted on 07/28/2005 8:07:38 AM PDT by APFel (This space for sale or rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson