Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mike182d
The question is: are we defining religions here as an entity in and of themselves or by the acts of its alleged followers? The dark history of Islam is not about the wrongdoings of over-zealous followers but rather a product of the religion itself, as an entity. The same cannot be said about the history of the Catholic (Christian) Church and thus the histories of the two are no where near comparable.

From my standpoint, it is only in the past several centuries that Jews were as safe in Christian lands as they were in Muslim. It's only in the past 50-100 years that the Christian world has become significantly more friendly towards Jews than the Islamic world.

27 posted on 07/28/2005 8:12:19 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Celtjew Libertarian
From my standpoint, it is only in the past several centuries that Jews were as safe in Christian lands as they were in Muslim. It's only in the past 50-100 years that the Christian world has become significantly more friendly towards Jews than the Islamic world.

Why would Jews be more safe in the land governed by a holy book that exhorts its followers to kill Jews than in a land governed by those whose faith is based on the same God and scriptures as those of the Jews?

42 posted on 07/28/2005 9:06:40 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson