[longtermmemmory]

actually givent the AGE of the display, under the recent decision the cross should stay.

It is old. prior to 1989 nobody but this busybody objected so it is "institutional" as a memorial.

That lawyer is no lawyer.

[newzjunkey]

Yup. It's stood about 50 years in present concrete form and before that there was a wooden cross at the same location since the early 20th century. It's a landmark, a tourist attaction, a place where young people go, it's used by pilots for navigation.

If you want to see video of the lawyer behind the litigation admit his true agenda, go to the Prop A website.