Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush presses for CAFTA as DeLay predicts win
Reuters ^ | Jul 27, 2005

Posted on 07/27/2005 10:42:51 AM PDT by Happy2BMe

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush urged Republican hold outs on Wednesday to back a controversial free trade agreement with Central America, and party leaders predicted he would win but only after a tough fight for votes.

"The president reminded us that we come here not only to represent our district but to represent the nation," House of Representatives Majority Leader Tom DeLay told reporters after a Capitol Hill meeting between Bush and House Republicans, many of whom have opposed it on the grounds that it will hurt industries in their regions. "It will be a tough vote but we'll pass CAFTA tonight," the Texas Republican said. "We will honor our commitments to the south, we will protect our national security and will do it all with very few Democrats."

The long-awaited vote would end months of uncertainty about the fate of the U.S.-Central American Free Trade Agreement, or CAFTA, which lowers trade barriers between the United States, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic.

The White House has a harder time rounding up votes for CAFTA than for any other recent trade pact because of stiff opposition from many Republicans in textile and sugar-producing states who fear it will cause job losses.

In addition, most Democrats oppose CAFTA on the grounds that its labor provisions are not tough enough for a region with a poor record on workers' rights. The White House says the labor provisions are stronger than any previous trade agreement and consistent with guidelines Congress set in 2002.

Bush appealed to House Republicans to put aside any "parochial interests" they might have about CAFTA and look at the broader benefits of the pact to the United States and the six other countries, DeLay said.

"It is good for our national security in supporting these fledging democracies at our back door. It is good in our effort against illegal immigration. It is good for our economy," DeLay said.

DeLay said Republicans would gavel the CAFTA vote to a close "when we get 218," the number of votes needed for approval. Republican leaders have angered Democrats in the past by holding votes open until they finally pressure enough party members to vote the way the leadership wants.

CHINA TRADE VOTE

Several Republicans from the textile states of South Carolina, Alabama and Georgia are expected to support CAFTA after reaching a deal with Republican leaders and U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman to address specific concerns.

However, many Republicans from North Carolina -- which has experienced heavy textile job losses -- have remained opposed.

The Bush administration also has made promises aimed at reducing sugar industry opposition to the pact, but many Republicans from sugar-producing states such as Louisiana, Florida, Montana and Idaho continue to have concerns.

The vote on CAFTA will be proceeded by a vote on Republican bill aimed at addressing a number of trade issues with China. House leaders expect to pick up the support of some Republicans in industrial states like Pennsylvania with that bill.

Only six Democrats have publicly announced their support for CAFTA. Portman told Reuters he remained hopeful that many more would vote for it in the end, but declined to give any estimate.

Portman said he had just come from a meeting with three undecided Democrats and they had refused to tell him on they planned to vote on CAFTA.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; 2008; cafta; gop; nafta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-268 next last
To: dead

LOL!


61 posted on 07/27/2005 12:15:55 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
"To say nothing of your inability to vote in any American election because you are "NOT" an American."

================================

Neither will any of the rest of us be for very long. The concept of "An American" is about to transform into "An American Traveller".

CAFTA will usher it in. You won't like it.

62 posted on 07/27/2005 12:17:34 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
I think you won the argument here. Since I am not a citizen yet I should not express my opinion and expose the idiocy of some people on this forum. (extreme sarcasm).
63 posted on 07/27/2005 12:17:40 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

...I am absolutely sure that you have never voted for President Bush...

Then you remain absolutely wrong.


64 posted on 07/27/2005 12:17:52 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican

This A-hole isn't even American?


65 posted on 07/27/2005 12:19:15 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
"I think you won the argument here. Since I am not a citizen yet I should not express my opinion and expose the idiocy of some people on this forum. (extreme sarcasm).

Not only are you not an American Citizen, you are the worst kind of non-citizen, Mr."If you don't agree with me you are a "stupid racist punk"". Some of us remember your comments against Americans and will never forget. But I am sure your own country will applaud you.

66 posted on 07/27/2005 12:20:56 PM PDT by JustAnAmerican (Americans hire Americans. Traitors hire illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: khenrich; agitator
" Think of it this way, would you rather your dollars go to China, or to Central America?"

#60.

=======================================

Did you hear that China's economic might (thanks to disastrous trade policy in favor of Communist China) just emboldened them to bid for a major United States owned oil corporation within the past two weeks?

You are aware of that, right?

67 posted on 07/27/2005 12:21:01 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Nope, he was one of the ones using Racist, Stupid and punk in every thread until he got booted from the forums.


68 posted on 07/27/2005 12:21:52 PM PDT by JustAnAmerican (Americans hire Americans. Traitors hire illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Burf
That would be from the same group as all the Mexicans who have purchased American Made automobiles since NAFTA was passed. Thats what we told would happen wasn't it?

Either that group or the one who said passing NAFTA would remove the incentive for mexicans to immigrate to the US illegally.

69 posted on 07/27/2005 12:22:46 PM PDT by skeeter ("What's to talk about? It's illegal." S Bono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ex-expromissor

Only problem is that if we get rid of the current batch of whores in Congress they'll soon be replaced by another bunch of sell-outs........many go in with the right mindset but's pretty apparent that once they're in Babylon, DC for any length of time they succumb to the various temptations.

My idea would be to try everything possible to stop domestic & foreign corporations as well as gov'ts. from being able to influence our reps with $, trips, presents, etc. The only way the American public can ever get true representation again is to do whatever it takes to remove these lobbysists from buying off those that we elected to represent us.


70 posted on 07/27/2005 12:25:10 PM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican

Figgers.

What a jerk.


71 posted on 07/27/2005 12:26:02 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com; OpusatFR
We are finished, Bush has destroyed the economy (extreme sarcasm)

Economic Activity Expands on Retail Sales

AP ^ | 7/27/05 | Jennie Aversa

Posted on 07/27/2005 11:33:56 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

The economy flashed fresh signals of strength in the last two months, with factories buzzing and cash registers ka-chinging despite high gas prices.

The latest snapshot emerging from the Federal Reserve's survey of the business climate around the country, released Wednesday, suggested the economy has bounced back nicely from a springtime soft patch. The job market showed some improvements and inflation was fairly contained, the survey also found.

The picture was consistent with the assessment Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan offered last week when he delivered the central bank's midyear economic outlook to Congress.

At that time, Greenspan signaled that short-term interest rates will continue to move higher in the months ahead in an effort to keep the economy and inflation on an even keel. Economists widely expect Fed policymakers will boost rates by another quarter-percentage point at their next meeting, Aug. 9. The Fed's survey appears to support such a move.

http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1216

72 posted on 07/27/2005 12:27:02 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Why we cannot have a President who only represents 1% of the American people,

Why we do now. You can say that about Pres. Bush. Why do you think they don't publish public opinion polls about the CAFTA, and why the president has never spoken about it to the American people, but has spoken to the OAS, the Central American presidents, the Andean community and various business groups that represent international interests?
73 posted on 07/27/2005 12:28:01 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
You won the argument again by refering to me as a non US citizen. Very deep thought you have.
74 posted on 07/27/2005 12:28:43 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Ex-expromissor; Happy2BMe

Just a tip, but when you do email them, ask for a written response back, and keep them for future reference.


75 posted on 07/27/2005 12:30:18 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Go away monkey boy. Keep your lies to yourself.


76 posted on 07/27/2005 12:30:18 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

If you are not a United States Citizen, why are these matters of any interest to you?


77 posted on 07/27/2005 12:30:33 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
"...he was one of the ones using Racist, Stupid and punk in every thread until he got booted from the forums."

Yes, indeed, that was on the immigration threads. As I recall, this dipstick was one of the most vocal of the pro-illegal alien/cheap labor lobby, known now as the FR resident quisling contingent.

Of course, not being a citizen and all, we probably can't categorize him as a quisling...not yet.

We neither need nor want future quislings as newly minted American citizens. Lets hope this one returns to his native land, wherever that may be.

78 posted on 07/27/2005 12:31:36 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Since I am not a citizen yet I should not express my opinion and expose the idiocy of some people on this forum. (extreme sarcasm).

You're free express your opinion, but no one here should mistake it as one coming from someone who has America's best interests at heart.

79 posted on 07/27/2005 12:31:39 PM PDT by skeeter ("What's to talk about? It's illegal." S Bono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Is everyone on this thread a Democrat or what? Whine whine whine. "it's going to move all our jobs to south america" bla bla bla BS. Man! We need a level-headed economist here to help you all realize that NAFTA helped both the Mexican and the American economies. NAFTA did not take out jobs. China did not take our jobs. China created it's own jobs. Protectionism never works. It only breeds isolation and economic depression, not to menion torpedoing all our diplomatic efforts on everyone's part. CAFTA is basically a huge win-win except for the sugar and textile industries. The size of the economy of all these CAFTA countries together is equal to that of Sacramento, CA. We are trying to help them up, and they will help us in return. There really aren't too many negative effects here. All I needed to know that CAFTA was a good thing was to see my ultra-lib representative Evans screaming his lungs out at the local union hall about how after CAFTA there will be no jobs and we will all be living in the street swimming in our own feces. Don't let the media and the Dims tell you what is and isn't good for us. Economists know the economy, biased reporters and liberal hypocrites don't! I thought us Freepers would have better sense than this.


80 posted on 07/27/2005 12:32:14 PM PDT by polyester~monkey (www.polyestermonkey.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-268 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson