Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Das Outsider

Simple... If I were Bush, faced with this, I'd conference with the General at Whiteman AFB (where the B2s are), SecDef, the general in charge at NORAD, and the JCS, go over the MAOs (major attack options) with Mecca and Medina as the primary targets aiming for the Grand Mosque in Mecca and the holy sites in Medina, use the low yield (250KT, no megaton bombs--has vaporize/incinerate effect but less long term implications) on the B2, the one that is launched via an air/ground cruise missle, order a sorty of those planes to bomb those sites, while particularly avoiding attacks on the surrounding areas.. Also would launch F14s from carriers in the Med to level the Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock)...

If theory is corrct that destruction of the grand mosque and kaaba in Mecca would put an end to Islam, then no more need be done, other than wipe out the remaining individuals behind terror attacks and outlaw Islam.


92 posted on 07/27/2005 1:24:35 AM PDT by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by a majority vote" Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Schwaeky
OK, then. Good answer. I was afraid your solution was going to involve "dialogue" at first. ;)

No need to use the high-yield nukes unless we absolutely have to. Wouldn't the same scenario work if you replaced 250 kiloton nukes with MOABs or the like?
105 posted on 07/27/2005 10:49:43 AM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson