Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New research reveals that children have dangerous chemicals in their blood.
MSNBS Newsweek ^ | 07.26.05 | Martha Brant

Posted on 07/26/2005 6:50:28 PM PDT by Coleus

Doctors once thought that the placenta would shield a fetus from harmful chemicals and pollutants. But new research shows that may not be the case. A study published this month by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an advocacy group based in Washington DC, found traces of 287 chemicals in the umbilical cord blood of 10 infants. They included mercury, pesticides and the chemicals used in stain-resistant coating and fire-retardant foam. The findings prompted concerns since children’s smaller brains, developing organs and more porous brains put them more at risk from such toxins than adults. "A child's brain is very vulnerable and developing very rapidly in utero and during the first two years of life," says Jane Houlihan, co-author of the study.

While former threats like smallpox and polio are now under control, conditions like autism and asthma are on the rise. Autism rates are up tenfold, asthma cases have doubled and incidences of childhood cancers like leukemia and brain cancer are also high. No one has pinpointed the cause of the increases yet. But reports like this one may leave many parents feeling like they need a PhD in chemistry just to keep their children healthy in an unhealthy, even toxic, world. The EWG study detected perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs), for example, in all 10 of the newborns' blood at a range of 3.37 to 10.7 parts per billion. It's not clear whether chemicals at this ratio can cause cancer or birth defects or precisely what, if any, levels would be safe in such a young population, but these levels are certainly not naturally occurring. The samples also contained up to 14,200 parts per trillion of polybrominate dephenyl ethers (PBDEs), which have been linked to brain and thyroid development problems.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: autism; chemicals; newborns; prenataldevelopment; terotogens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Environmental Working Group, anti-capitalist, Communist whacko environmental group linked to the Teresa Heinz, Drummond Pike tides foundation I'll wait for some more research from less radical groups.  These type of people don't  actually care for children, aren't they on the political left and pro-abortion while at the same time saving spotted owls behind the Big K, humpback whales and turtle eggs worshiping Gaia and mother earth?

What we need is more DDT use worldwide so that lives can be saved and suffering reduced.

1 posted on 07/26/2005 6:50:29 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus


http://www.mafhoum.com/press3/102P8_files/1483081.jpg


Brant served abroad as Newsweek’s Mexico City bureau chief from December 1996 through December 1998. She wrote several Latin American edition cover stories including “No Place Like Home” (6/15/98) about the tremendous financial and ideological impact of Mexican immigrants on their native country. Other covers from Latin American include “Mayan Chic,” (11/3/97), the modern revival of Mayan culture, and “The Importance of Being Ernesto” (5/5/97), the political education of President Ernesto Zedillo.

She served as a Washington correspondent from February 1995 to December 1996, reporting a number of exclusive stories on Hillary Clinton such as the cover “Saint or Sinner?” (01/15/96). She joined Newsweek as a summer intern in June 1993 and was promoted to reporter in 1994. She was part of the Newsweek team reporting on the Oklahoma City bombing.

Brant came to Newsweek after receiving an M.A. in Latin American studies from Stanford University. She worked as a reporter at the Daily Republic in Fairfield, Ca. and the Tico Times in San Jose, Costa Rica. She was an intern at CNN (Spanish) in Los Angeles and the Orange County Register in Santa Ana, Ca. A native of Laguna Beach, Ca., Brant holds a B.A. in history from Yale University and is fluent in Spanish.


2 posted on 07/26/2005 6:55:04 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
The very worst of them all, of course, is dihydrogen monoxide... killing thousands every year.
3 posted on 07/26/2005 7:00:45 PM PDT by thoughtomator (How many liberties shall we give up to maintain the pretense that we are not at war with Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Exactly. The "Environmental Working Group" is a far left group. Just the name itself should tell you what kind of organization it is. There are a lot of things that are found in trace amounts in the blood. The problem with groups like this is they don't do thorough studies nor do they take statistically sound samples. Much like groups up in arms over artifical sweeteners and MSG a small amount of smoke and lots of mirrors. The primary indication that someone or a group is a kooksville is they never cite mainstream sources or fund truly independent studies they also never do the basic research to confirm their outstanding self-evident claims.


4 posted on 07/26/2005 7:01:47 PM PDT by Ma3lst0rm (Global warming or Life is a Beach? You decide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

No, actually, this seems like serious business, and as a parent it worries me. You don't even have to be a scientist to know that there's bad stuff in the water and the air. Just look out your window or turn on your tap. Why has the simple use of our senses become politicized? Can't I favor gun freedoms, less government intrusion in my business and strong defense without thinking it's also okay for my children to be poisoned?


5 posted on 07/26/2005 7:02:02 PM PDT by Nick5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
New research reveals that children have dangerous chemicals in their blood.

Liquified Count Chocula being the most dangerous. ;)

6 posted on 07/26/2005 7:03:00 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Democracy...will be revengeful, bloody, and cruel." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
New research reveals that children have dangerous chemicals in their blood.

Did they test adults too? Or would that have played hell with the the results they want to get to prove their agenda?

7 posted on 07/26/2005 7:14:57 PM PDT by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick5

Bad science is worse than no science. Parts per trillion? What's the margin of error, and where is the hard data supporting the "Unsafe" exposure limits? No one wants to see their children poisoned, but we need a little common sense here.


8 posted on 07/26/2005 7:16:23 PM PDT by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

The first sentence makes me question the entirety of this article.


9 posted on 07/26/2005 7:20:22 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick5
No, actually, this seems like serious business, and as a parent it worries me.

The sky is falling - panic time!

This is junk science. Ultra low concentrations more toxic than higher ones? Blarney. Homeopathy.

Go ahead and run in circles if you wish but this is junk.

10 posted on 07/26/2005 7:30:07 PM PDT by corkoman (Overhyped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; afraidfortherepublic; dead; seowulf; Severa; USA21; alnick; FormerLurker; Mack the knife; ..
Autism Bump.

Adds a new wrinkle as to where the Mercury can come from!

As stated before, I'm not convinced of any link between Mercury and Autism and junk science studies like this contribute to my skepticism.
11 posted on 07/26/2005 7:35:15 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
New research reveals that children have dangerous chemicals in their blood.

We'll just have to ban children then.

12 posted on 07/26/2005 7:46:56 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
We'll just have to ban children then.

And the production method will have to be tightly regulated.

13 posted on 07/26/2005 8:05:44 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nick5
Can't I favor gun freedoms, less government intrusion in my business and strong defense without thinking it's also okay for my children to be poisoned? >>

LOL, you sound like one of those harried liberals from the NEA and NOW, Bill Clinton used the term "for the children", "the children" a lot.  Seemed to work especially with women.

Did you or someone in your family you know live before 1980? Before the Clean air and water legislation was passed, factories spewed out tons of pollutants from smoke stacks and dumping sludge in the rivers, most apartment buildings incinerated their garbage, we burned our dead leaves every fall.  During some summers our air was tinged green or yellow from all the pollution and smog, no catalytic converters with lots of smoke and lead coming out of the exhaust pipes, our mothers smoked while pregnant and we breathed in second-had smoke from both parents.  I even went down a high sliding pond onto the pavement, Nope, no wood chips for me.  And to tell you the truth, I knew very few kids who had asthma, ADD, autism, being allergic to peanuts? never heard of it before until a couple of yrs. ago. Doctors now recommend that bedrooms of newborns stay a little dusty so that the children can build up good immune systems. AND WE USED TO RUN BEHIND THE DDT SMOKE TRUCK! and survived. Your comment made me look for a joke I received in e-mail:


14 posted on 07/26/2005 8:11:01 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
They included mercury, pesticides and the chemicals used in stain-resistant coating and fire-retardant foam.

Wow! Babies that won't burn, stain, or get termites. If they could only invent self-cleaning diapers.

15 posted on 07/26/2005 8:15:37 PM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

no nicotine or nicotine metabolites ?


16 posted on 07/26/2005 8:28:03 PM PDT by catroina54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nick5
I don't trust the information from EWG or any other bunch with an agenda, but I agree that there's some scary stuff out there. My two 100-pound dogs got loose several years back, and we eventually found them playing in the stream near a chemical plant. They both died within 18 months of weird diseases...one rare cancer, one autoimmune disease, both of them things that popped up once in thousands of cases. Made me think.
17 posted on 07/26/2005 8:56:55 PM PDT by Foxfire4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"New research reveals that children have dangerous chemicals in their blood."

Those bastards!

18 posted on 07/26/2005 8:58:16 PM PDT by gorush (Exterminate the Moops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Yeah. Chicken nuggets and processed carrots.


19 posted on 07/26/2005 9:15:12 PM PDT by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Foxfire4

Unfortunately obvious evidence like that doesn't make enough people think. Just as the left has shot itself in the foot by calling abortion a "right", so we of the right are shooting ourselves in the foot by calling unregulated pollution a "right." Once the left wakes up and starts talking cancer rates instead of nonsense about spotted owls, our blindness is going to cost us a national election.


20 posted on 07/26/2005 10:39:14 PM PDT by Nick5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson