[Darkwolf377]

I read it, but as I said, that's an opinion piece. "Using the new terminology" is meaningless--since 9-11, Rumsfeld hasn't said "The War on Terror" each time he refers to the WOT. He's said "The Iraq conflict" and "The War" and "the ongoing" whatever.

This is merely another label for the same thing. I have yet to hear the White House drop the term WOT consistently, or use any of these so-called replacements consistently. Two occassions isn't some radical new direction.

[Types_with_Fist]

Ok. I just didn't understand why the piece was excerpted. It's UPI story about a Times piece. Are we not allowed to post the whole of UPI articles? Or, do we have to wait until NewsMax re-writes them?...:-)

[Hadean]

The problem isn't the content of this one article. The problem is that it is spread all over. Correct or not, a lot of people are hearing it. That's why it's here for your ridiculing pleasures.