Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
Well, I know about the Special Liquidity Facility, which was announced in October of 1999, and coincided with the start of the last blowoff in the stock market (what I consider the true bubble). But from what I understand the SLF was never used. It was there in case of problems, which never happened. I had always assumed that it was the mere existence of the SLF which made everyone so giddy.

How else did money get into the system? Did it show up in the funds rate? We were still in a strong dollar policy, which isn't associated with easy money. My guess is a lot of overseas money came here as part of the "safe haven" effect.

51 posted on 07/27/2005 9:59:30 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
How else did money get into the system? Did it show up in the funds rate? We were still in a strong dollar policy, which isn't associated with easy money. My guess is a lot of overseas money came here as part of the "safe haven" effect.

The Fed creates money by buying Treasuries from banks. The banks then have to lend out this new money. It probably wouldn't show up in the funds rate, although they could have dropped the funds rate too. I don't recall. Safe haven could have played a part too, but most was Greenspan.

52 posted on 07/27/2005 10:13:50 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson