[Final Authority]

You explain yourself well, but the thing about being a victim? Hardly.

There are two people on these threads routinely attacked because of their views and positions, Michael Savage and Mitt Romney, you can add Pat Buchanan as well, if you like. What do they have in common? Well, they are the anti-GWB, the anti-GOP, they are the outspoken, they make the kool-aide drinkers very uneasy because they make them think, and they are often right as well.

It won't be long before Mitt attains national recognition and prominence as he runs for national office. What will happen then? He will be framed in the likeness of the conservative Howard Dean by the haters of true conservatism, nationalism, and decency.

[JohnnyZ]

Well, they are the anti-GWB, the anti-GOP

So according to you, Mitt Romney is the anti-GOP.

Guess that means you agree he's a RINO.

[JohnnyZ]

Well, they are the anti-GWB, the anti-GOP

So according to you, Mitt Romney is the anti-GOP.

Guess that means you agree he's a RINO.

[Agrarian]

I said that Romney would be a disaster as the 2008 candidate, responding to a post about him flip-flopping on abortion, and you jump immediately to calling me a religious bigot.

If that isn't playing the politics of victimization, I don't know what is.

If you can show me that Mitt Romney holds Michael Savage and Pat Buchanan's views on things like immigration, I'd be *very* curious to see that. I'm sorry, you've really lost me if you are somehow trying to find a common thread between Romney, Buchanan, and Savage...

Do you instantly accuse the people who criticize Buchanan of being anti-Catholic, or the people who criticize Michael Savage as being anti-Semites, BTW?