Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supersonic JDAM drop marks increase in Raptor capability
Air Force Link ^ | 7/25/2005 | Christopher Ball

Posted on 07/25/2005 5:09:22 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

7/25/2005 - EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFPN) -- As the midafternoon sun blazed on the Mojave Desert and thunderclouds loomed in the distance, a sleek dark gray war bird took to the sky to push the envelope of flight testing.

At the controls, Maj. John Teichert, a 411th Flight Test Squadron test pilot, pushed the F/A-22 Raptor past Mach 1, opened the weapons bay and released a guided bomb unit-32 1,000-pound joint direct attack munition, marking the first time a Raptor has dropped a JDAM at supersonic speed.

"Qualifying the Raptor to release GPS-guided bombs at supersonic speeds is a significant milestone for the program," Major Teichert said. "Releasing a bomb under such conditions provides a notable increase in Raptor tactical capabilities."

The GBU-32 separation test vehicle that was released is the same size, shape and weight as a real bomb, but without the guidance kit.

In 2004, the Raptor proved it was capable of air-to-ground operations with subsonic JDAM releases. Other aircraft have released a JDAM at supersonic speeds.

"But the speeds at which we will eventually release the JDAM over the next couple of weeks will far exceed any current aircraft's JDAM envelope," Major Teichert said.

Additionally, this was the first time a JDAM was released supersonically from an internal weapons bay, officials said.

Even with thorough mission planning and briefing, including several contingencies, by the test team and the test conductor, the testing was not without its challenges.

Some of these challenges included limited range airspace to reach test conditions, longer range travel of the weapon after release, more difficulty with the photo chase aircraft keeping up with the Raptor and harsh conditions for the aircraft and the weapon at release.

"All these factors obviously increased the stress level of the mission,” Major Teichert said. “Attention to detail was heightened in order to ensure a successful test.”

Major Teichert credited the mission success to thorough coordination among the test team, the mission crew and the range controllers.

"Pilots and engineers had coordinated the details of the test during the test planning phase," he said. "This close orchestration allowed the test to meet its objectives as well as demonstrate operational relevance."

The Raptor is designed to operate high and fast where it has an enhanced tactical advantage over air-to-air and surface-to-air threats, the major said.

"Adding the capability of supersonic JDAM provides a substantial increase in bomb range to destroy lethal threats well outside of their engagement envelopes," he said. "The Raptor is essential to the Global Strike concept, and supersonic JDAM optimizes that capability." (Courtesy of Air Force Materiel Command News Service)


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: edwardsafb; fa22raptor; jdam; miltech; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Supersonic JDAM drop marks increase in Raptor capability
OVER CALIFORNIA --
An F/A-22 Raptor, flown by Maj. John Teichert, releases a guided bomb unit-32 1,000-pound joint direct attack munitions at supersonic speed for the first time near California's Panamint Mountain range. Major Teichert is a test pilot assigned to the 411th Flight Test Squadron at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. (U.S. Air Force photo by Darin Russell)
1 posted on 07/25/2005 5:09:23 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Holy Frijoles! To have ANYTHING to hit a target a supersonic speed means that is it for Air to Ground combat. Air has it, pretty much forever.

But, as much as I like the F-22, there will never, EVER be an aircraft as beautiful as the F-15.

I know, lots of "forevers and nevers" there. But I am in a hyperbolic mood.


2 posted on 07/25/2005 5:13:56 PM PDT by Shazbot29 (If you paid attention you'd be worried, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

BOOM! :D


3 posted on 07/25/2005 5:13:59 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Oooh new toys!

Say shall we live fire test that baby in some really sandy far away location? One populated with lots of Brainwashed Muslims out to kill us?

We need more glass in the west don't we?

Ok ok. </sarc>
4 posted on 07/25/2005 5:14:41 PM PDT by Danae ( Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Goin downtown?
5 posted on 07/25/2005 5:15:00 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shazbot29

I love the way the F-15 looks as well. :D


6 posted on 07/25/2005 5:15:10 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; Aeronaut
Aviation List ping
7 posted on 07/25/2005 5:15:27 PM PDT by GoldCountryRedneck ("Forget about Lift, Weight, Drag, and Thrust. Airplanes fly on MONEY." - Author unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shazbot29
But, as much as I like the F-22, there will never, EVER be an aircraft as beautiful as the F-15.

Not even the A-10?

8 posted on 07/25/2005 5:17:25 PM PDT by null and void (Be vewwy vewwy qwiet, we're hunting wahabbits...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

the testing was not without its challenges.

Some of these challenges included limited range airspace to reach test conditions,

longer range travel of the weapon after release,

The benefits just keep coming.

Increased standoff means more safety for the pilots
and less for the target, I wonder if they've ever thought
about rocket packs for the JDAMs.


9 posted on 07/25/2005 5:18:53 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Not even the A-10?

May not be as purty, but it shor' can kick up a fuss......

10 posted on 07/25/2005 5:20:33 PM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Ask a jar head and he'll tell you the A-10 is the prettiest bird in the world. I live in flight pattern for NAS Willow Grove and they train hard here...


11 posted on 07/25/2005 5:23:12 PM PDT by halfright (3 Days post Hanoi Jane....2200 Meeting of the band of brothers to piss on her grave...Semper Fi...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The GBU-32 separation test vehicle that was released is the same size, shape and weight as a real bomb, but without the guidance kit.

That's why they call it a "shape".

We had nuke shapes that we practiced with in the AF.

12 posted on 07/25/2005 5:24:04 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Additionally, this was the first time a JDAM was released supersonically from an internal weapons bay, officials said.

Wow, I'm no pilot or engineer or anything, but just intuitively speaking, one can see that this is one well-built bird!

13 posted on 07/25/2005 5:28:03 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

My humble list of airplane beauty (USA):

1. F-15 Eagle
2. F-14 Tomcat
3. F-22 Raptor (Lightning)
4. A-10 Warthog(almost a tie with the F-22)
5. F-16 Falcon
7. F/A-18 Hornet
8. B-1 Supersonic Bomber
9. B-52 Bomber

Special Mention: SR-71 Blackbird (a different class altogether)


Ugliest:

4. V-22 Osprey
3. F-117 Stealth Fighter
2. B-2 Stealth Bomber
1. F-4 Phantom


Just my list and it is based on asthetiscs only, not fighting ability or anything else important.


14 posted on 07/25/2005 5:28:27 PM PDT by Shazbot29 (If you paid attention you'd be worried, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
Big pic at linked article and here.
15 posted on 07/25/2005 5:29:44 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shazbot29

There is nothing so beautiful as the P-51D.


16 posted on 07/25/2005 5:30:49 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (Proudly confusing editors and readers since 1981!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shazbot29
Hey! The old F-4 bent wing aint ugly!

I was going to send it up as one of the pretty ones.

Although I worked on them, I actually like the WW2 warbirds better, for aesthetic tastes.

The P-51 and Spitfire Mark IX in planform view are the prettiest.

17 posted on 07/25/2005 5:31:35 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: narby; GAB-1955

The P-51D was lovely for its day. As was the B-29.

I guess it wasn't fair for me to include the F-4, since all the rest of the aircraft I listed are modern-era craft (sad about the retirement of the F-14. I loved the variable geometry).

I was also tempted to add the F-23 jsf but it is so close to the F-22 (and I am not sure it is deployed) that it seemed redundant.

I am sure all of these craft hold a special beauty to those who depend(ed) on them, flew them, maintained them and loved them.

This is like a beauty contest where every contestant is somebody's Mom ;)


18 posted on 07/25/2005 5:43:04 PM PDT by Shazbot29 (If you paid attention you'd be worried, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: narby

My favorites in no particular order are,

P-51
SR-71
F-4 Phantom
F-15
F-14
F-117
WWII era Corsair(F-4) I think.


19 posted on 07/25/2005 5:45:16 PM PDT by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: halfright
Hatboro?

Are you old enough to remember the sun dimming when the flying boxcars passed over?
20 posted on 07/25/2005 5:48:06 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson