Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executives Who Inhale
New York Business ^ | July 25, 2005 | Matthew Flamm

Posted on 07/25/2005 5:01:43 PM PDT by Wolfie

Executives Who Inhale

New York -- Some New York executives unwind in the evening with a glass of wine. Others go out for a beer. And some take the edge off in a way they rarely discuss with their colleagues. Particularly in the summer, when children are at camp, these Gothamites are kicking back in a fashion reminiscent of their college days. "When my son's away, I keep my bong and my bag out on the dining room table," says Jim, co-owner of a furniture manufacturing company, who, like every other pot smoker interviewed in this article, asked not to be identified. "It makes me feel young again.

Despite the ongoing war on drugs and the stigma surrounding any illegal activity, a certain portion of the New York business community never turned in its rolling papers. For many of these otherwise law-abiding citizens, taking a few tokes of their favorite illicit substance is simply their preferred way to decompress. Though they might conceal their after-hours smoking from their co-workers, they insist that, used in moderation, the evil weed doesn't have to hurt job performance.

"It's an asset to the conceptualizing part of the business," Jim says. "It's a liability to the implementation part."

Among New York professionals, smokers tend to be discreet, even when children aren't in the picture. There's too much to lose from being typecast as a stoner. After all, Cheech and Chong--the pothead comedians of the 1970s--weren't exactly known for productivity.

"It's not something I would discuss with clients, even if they brought the subject up," says Sam, who has his own architecture firm. "And I only smoke with close friends."

Most Popular

But statistics suggest that some of those clients are probably indulging as well. According to the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services, 97 million Americans have smoked marijuana at least once, and it is the most widely used illicit drug in the United States.

In the marijuana underground, New York has a reputation not only for widespread use but for the buying habits of its upscale users. City dwellers fork over as much as $600 an ounce for top-quality product, while dealers brag about selling strains grown from winners of the Amsterdam Cannabis Cup.

The city is also famous for its efficient delivery services.

"It's the only place in the country where you can get cannabis delivered, uptown and downtown, faster than pizza or Chinese food," says Allen St. Pierre, the executive director of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, based in Washington.

New York is also known for strict enforcement of laws against marijuana. Under the Giuliani administration, marijuana-related arrests peaked in 2000 at about 74,000; about 90% of those busts were for possession.

Arrests for grass have dropped by more than half under Mayor Michael Bloomberg, to about 34,000 last year--a number that still makes the city among the national leaders in marijuana arrests per capita, according to NORML.

Though there is disagreement about government policy, even critics of the laws warn that heavy pot use can stunt ambition and accomplishment, as well as destroy personal relationships.

Growing Use

"Marijuana is the most difficult drug to get people to give up, because it allows them to keep functioning," says Andrew Park, a Manhattan psychotherapist who specializes in addiction. "You can't see the damage to a person's life that you would if they were smoking crack or shooting dope."

But neither the law nor the dangers of abuse have dampened the nation's appetite for cannabis: the government's survey recorded 15 million current users in 2003, compared with 10 million in 1995.

"Alcohol dulls everything," says Abe, a litigator at a Manhattan law firm who says he would rather toke than imbibe. "Pot sharpens certain things, like creativity."

Marijuana is also the one illicit substance that appears to enjoy widespread appeal across social and economic lines.

"Lawyers, accountants, actors, cooks ... I deal with people across the board," says Jason, who has been selling marijuana full time in New York since 1996. "From people living in hellholes who can't really afford it, to people whose secretaries I have to talk to before I can talk to them."

But longtime aficionados find that, just like the sports they played in college, the drug is something they can no longer partake of as often as they did when they were young.

"The lifestyle changed when I had kids," says Bill, who manages a short-term apartment complex in midtown Manhattan and smokes only on those rare occasions when his children are not around. "Yet I still have a roach, wrapped in aluminum foil, in the back of my sock drawer."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: anslingerslegacy; bongbrigade; jackbootedthugs; lawbreakers; potheads; weaklings; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 last
To: Know your rights
"and it may well be that thanks to decades of drug criminalization drugmakers have finally come up with that drug in meth."

Well, if making recreational drugs illegal leads to such innovative advances, maybe we should make all drugs illegal. That may be the key to motivating the pharmaceuticals to find the cure for the common cold.

What a maroon.

161 posted on 08/04/2005 5:51:29 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
Meth was first synthesized prior to 1920. It wasn't illegal in this country for decades after that to my knowledge.
162 posted on 08/04/2005 6:23:04 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: youngjim

Those potheads are completely misreading that sonnet. "Weed" refers there to clothing, not to any sort of plant.


163 posted on 08/04/2005 6:23:30 AM PDT by oldfarmer (Mark 16:17-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Well, if making recreational drugs illegal leads to such innovative advances, maybe we should make all drugs illegal. That may be the key to motivating the pharmaceuticals to find the cure for the common cold.

If millions so craved that cure that they were willing to pay through the nose for it, and risk taking the concoctions of toolshed chemists, then that might work. I know of no reason to think that cure is so ardently desired ... do you?

164 posted on 08/05/2005 12:32:49 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz
Meth was first synthesized prior to 1920. It wasn't illegal in this country for decades after that to my knowledge.

Of more relevance is the date when the household-ingredient method of preparation was devised; I'm sure that was considerably later than the 1920s.

165 posted on 08/05/2005 12:35:07 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"Of more relevance is the date when the household-ingredient method of preparation was devised; I'm sure that was considerably later than the 1920s."

No, you were making the argument that meth is a product of the drug war, which it is clearly not. You said, "[T]hanks to decades of drug criminalization drugmakers have finally come up with that drug in meth." Meth was created before the drug war ever started. It is true that few people would be making it in their kitchens from household ingredients if it were legal and available for purchase ready-made from the store, but that really isn't relevant to the question of whether meth is a product of the drug war or not.
166 posted on 08/06/2005 12:52:11 PM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: kellynch

Alcohol doesn't stink? What about beer breath? yuck!


167 posted on 08/06/2005 12:57:15 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz
No, you were making the argument that meth is a product of the drug war, which it is clearly not.

I spoke carelessly ... it's the widespread use of meth that is a product of the drug war.

168 posted on 08/06/2005 2:25:43 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson