To: grundle
I often find myself in agreement with Rep. Paul, but not this time... his view betrays a very narrow, dated, and incomplete understanding of the problem. The Tamil Tigers, for example, have long since eschewed suicide attacks.
But of course the core of the problem is that the enemy considers the whole world its territory, and that there is nowhere to retreat to that is safe from their depredataions.
12 posted on
07/25/2005 12:26:01 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(How many liberties shall we give up to maintain the pretense that we are not at war with Islam?)
To: thoughtomator
I often find myself in agreement with Rep. Paul, but not this time... his view betrays a very narrow, dated, and incomplete understanding of the problem.Thanks for writing that . It expresses my sentiments exactly.- Tom
16 posted on
07/25/2005 12:40:32 PM PDT by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
To: thoughtomator
I'm with you on this one. Dr. Paul is my favorite Congress Critter on and over all basis, but he's out in left field on this one. Add back in all the sniper attacks, IED's, and non-suicide bombings and the picture he tries to discredit becomes quite clear.
This IS a war of ideology. It has never been about our troops or involvement in the Middle East. It hasn't been about that since before the rise of the Ottoman Empire. Either we kill them, or they will kill us. Period. I'd prefer we do it elsewhere.
Bush pushing the PATRIOT Act renewal while leaving the borders open is equally as assinine as Pauls statement above. Plenty of room under the "clueless moron" heading for both of them.
25 posted on
07/25/2005 1:08:24 PM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson